A simple diagnostic scoring system for COVID-19 screening

Author:

Widyastuti Yunita,Sari Djayanti,Kurniawaty Juni,Widodo Untung,Fitriani R.W Calcarina,Jufan Akhmad Yun,Sutaendy Ketut,Jaya Purnama,Ulfa Dinda

Abstract

Background: The COVID‐19 pandemic has prompted the world to make various efforts to control its spread by finding ways to diagnose COVID‐19 quickly and accurately. Early identification of COVID‐19 infection is essential, especially in hospitals with limited resources. We aimed to generate two scores based upon clinical and laboratory findings in patients screen for COVID-19 infection. Methodology: This study used a retrospective cohort design that involved 705 adults (≥ 18 y old) admitted in Dr. Sardjito Hospital and Dr. S. Hardjolukito Hospital. The patients' data collected included demographic characteristics, anamnesis on signs and symptoms, history of contact with COVID-19 patients, history of staying or visiting an endemic area, comorbidities, and laboratory and radiologic indicators. All variables with a P < 0.25 on the bivariate test were included in a univariable logistic regression. If the P < 0.05, the variable was included in the multivariable logistic regression with a P < 0.05 considered significant. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) producing an area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was used to assess discrimination power. Results: Two scores were generated; score in Model 1 consisted of clinical signs, basic laboratory indicators, and chest X-ray, and in Model 2 consisted of clinical signs, chest X-ray, basic and advanced laboratory indicators, including C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), albumin, and D-dimer. The ROC score of Model 1 was 0.801 (0.764−0. 838), which is considered good discrimination, and of Model 2 had excellent discrimination with a ROC of 0.858 (0.826−0. 891); the differences in the ROC of the two models was statistically significant (P = 0.03). The score of Model 1 more than 5 had 85% sensitivity and 61% specificity of positive COVID-19. A score of Model 2 more than 4 had 83% sensitivity and 72% specificity for diagnosing positive COVID-19. Conclusions: A simple score consisting of clinical symptoms and signs, and simple laboratory indicators can be used to screen for COVID-19 infection. Abbreviations: ARDS: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; CRP: C-reactive protein; MLR: monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio; NLR: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; RT-PCR: Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction; Key words: COVID-19; Screening System; Clinical Symptoms; Laboratory Indicators Citation: Widyastuti Y, Sari D, Kurniawaty J, Widodo U, Fitriani RW C, Jufan AY, Sutaendy K, Jaya P, Ulfa D. A simple diagnostic scoring system for COVID-19 screening. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2022;26(6):784-791. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i6.2076

Publisher

Aga Khan University Hospital

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3