The perception of obstetric healthcare workers to the partners’ presence in the operating room-a phenomenological study

Author:

Ventour Dale,Gardiner Kadija

Abstract

Objective: It is current practice in our setting to not admit a partner in theatre during cesarean section (CS) even though this is becoming commonplace in various countries. This study is designed to determine the views of healthcare workers, postpartum mothers and their accompanying partners on having a partner present in the operating roon (OR) during an elective CS at Port of Spain General Hospital, Trinidad, West Indies. Materials and Methods: The study’s theoretical model was based on a constructionist, interpretivist framework as well as phenomenological research. A semi-structured interview was conducted and a thematic approach was used to develop codes. This was analyzed by Qualitative Data Analysis (QDA miner) software and the following themes emerged: ‘Maternal support’; ‘Fathers’ marginalization’; ‘Nurses’ perception of fathers’ role’; ‘Healthcare workers’ perception of litigation and ‘Limiting factors’. Results: 70% of respondents were in favor of a partner being present in the operating room for an elective CS and thought it would help to keep the mother at ease by allowing her to hold hands with the partner, talk to them and be accompanied by them to the recovery room. Healthcare workers did think that male partners might not have much of an impact in the operating room as they would not know what to do and may actually pose a security threat if things did not go exactly as planned. Conclusions: Healthcare professionals were neutral about partners being present in the operating room but had concerns regarding partner’s presence in the operating room.  Key words: Anesthesia; Cesarean section; Health personnel; Parturients; Obstetric; Perception Citation: Ventour D, Gardiner K. The perception of obstetric healthcare workers to the partners’ presence in the operating room-a phenomenological study. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2023;27(4):528−534; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v27i4.2276 Received: May 08, 2023; Reviewed: June 22, 2023; Accepted: June 28, 2023

Publisher

Aga Khan University Hospital

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3