Author:
Cherry Matthew,Knott Christine E.
Abstract
Probability of detection (POD) evaluation is a widely accepted practice for quantifying the reliability of a nondestructive testing (NDT) technique. Inspections are often conceptualized and developed in laboratory environments, where factors affecting the inspection are highly controlled. However, when implemented in practice, NDT inspections suffer from many sources of variability, including changes from nominal geometry of the test piece, sensor variability, differences between operators, environmental effects on the sensor response including thermal and electromagnetic interference, and a myriad of other factors that are not present in the lab. Thus, to transition the NDT from the lab to production environments, engineers must have a quantified understanding of uncertainties. This is especially true for NDT systems that are implemented for safety-critical structures, where the life of the component may be managed with NDT. A fundamental question that must be answered in this context is: What is the largest discontinuity that could be missed when this NDT technique is implemented?
Publisher
The American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Inc.
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials,General Materials Science
Reference14 articles.
1. Agresti, Alan. 2007. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience. doi:10.1002/0470114754.
2. Annis, Charles, John C. Aldrin, and Harold A. Sabbagh. 2015a. “Profile Likelihood: What To Do When Maximum Probability of Detection Never Gets To One.” Materials Evaluation 73 (1): 96–99.
3. Annis, Charles, John C. Aldrin, and Harold A. Sabbagh. 2015b. “What is Missing in Nondestructive Testing Capability Evaluation?” Materials Evaluation 73 (1): 38–42.
4. Berens, Alan P. 1989. “NDE reliability data analysis.” In ASM Handbook, vol 17. Materials Park, OH: ASM International. 689-701.
5. Berens, Alan P., and Peter W. Hovey. 1981. Evaluation of NDE Reliability Characterization. vol. 1. Dayton, OH: University of Dayton Research Institute.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献