Affiliation:
1. ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, DAHİLİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, AİLE HEKİMLİĞİ ANABİLİM DALI
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of medical residents working at a faculty of medicine hospital about Traditional and Complementary Medicine (TCM).
Material-Method: This is a cross-sectional study. The study was conducted with clinical science assistants working at the faculty of medicine between 15 July and 15 December 2021. A survey containing questions to determine the clinical and demographic characteristics of the participants and their knowledge, behavior, and attitudes toward TCM applications was applied to the participants.
Results: A total of 261 medical residents participated. The average age was 29.4±2.6 years and 51.7% (n=135) were male. 82% of the participants were studying internal medicine sciences. The average length of time as a physician was found to be 4.4 years, and the average length of time as a physician in the total branch was 2.6 years. Cupping therapy was the most known method with 55.6%. The most frequently used method (19.2%) was phytotherapy; the most frequently recommended (16.5%) was phytotherapy; the most formally trained (4.2%), was cupping therapy; the most desired formal training (41%) was acupuncture; the most frequently declared method (11.9%) as another TCM method was diet. 36.4% of the participants found TCM useful. 82% thought that these methods should only be applied by trained physicians.
Conclusion: It was determined that the level of TCM knowledge among assistant physicians was low. Although the majority of participants had a positive attitude towards TCM, they had low rates of application, implementation, and recommendation.
Reference35 articles.
1. World Health Organization, General guidelines for methodologies on research and evaluation of traditional medicine. World Health Organization, 2000, 1, 1-71.
2. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, Complementary, Alternative, or Integrative Health: What’s In a Name?, https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/complementary-alternative-or-integrative-health-whats-in-a-name. Published 2021. Accessed.
Elif K, Ekerbiçer HÇ, Erkorkmaz Ü. Complementary, alternative and conventional medicine attitude scale: Turkish validity reliability study. Sakarya Tıp Dergisi. 2018;8(4):726-736.
3. Yüksel NA, Açıkgöz B, Yüksel C, Ayoğlu FN, Tuğçe E. Hekimlerin Geleneksel Ve Tamamlayıcı Tıp Uygulamalarına Bakış Açısı. ESTÜDAM Halk Sağlığı Dergisi. 2019;4(3):276-286.
4. Frass M, Strassl RP, Friehs H, Müllner M, Kundi M, Kaye AD. Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personel: a systematic review. Ochsner Journal. 2012;12(1):45-56.
5. Şahin S. Geleneksel, tamamlayıcı, alternatif tıp uygulamalarına genel bir bakış. Türkiye Aile Hekimligi Dergisi. 2017;21(4):159-162.