Abstract
The enduring conflicts among Middle Eastern nations have caused devastating casualties and loss of life, leading to deep human suffering and significant societal distress. Their impact is not limited to the immediate regions involved but has reverberated across communities within those countries. Additionally, the international community has been deeply affected by the conflict and has made efforts to seek a resolution. The inadequate understanding of collateral damage and a primitive mindset have resulted in the unfortunate deaths of numerous innocent civilians. This article explores the psychological mechanisms underlying collateral damage in the context of war and conflict. In an effort to shed light on the multifaceted nature of collateral damage and its impact on both affected populations and combatants, the complex interplay of cognitive, emotional, and social factors was explored. The aim was to explore the psychological consequences of collateral damage and provide theoretical assumptions to understand collateral damage and war. The SANRA narrative review method was adopted to discuss the psychological underpinnings of collateral damage. Several studies have explored the concept of collateral damage in the context of war and psychology. By understanding the psychological mechanisms behind collateral damage, it is possible to effectively address the root causes and develop strategies to minimise its occurrence in armed conflicts. Moreover, it is essential to prioritise the education of leaders and military personnel regarding the concept of collateral damage
Publisher
Scientific Journals Publishing House
Reference18 articles.
1. [1] Andreas, P. (2005). Criminalizing consequences of sanctions: Embargo busting and its legacy. International Studies Quarterly, 49(2), 335-360. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-8833.2005.00347.x.
2. [2] Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. (2019). SANRA – a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4, article number 5. doi: 10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8.
3. [3] Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms of moral disengagement. In W. Reich (Ed.), Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, theologies, states of mind (pp. 161-191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. [4] Byron, C. (2011). International humanitarian law and bombing campaigns: Legitimate military objectives and excessive collateral damage. In M. Schmitt, L. Arimatsu & T. McCormack (Eds.), Yearbook of international humanitarian law – 2010 (Vol. 13, pp 175-211). Den Haag: T.M.C. Asser Press. doi: 10.1007/978-90-6704-811-8_5.
5. [5] Chittaro, L., & Sioni, R. (2012). Killing non-human animals in video games: A study on user experience and desensitization to violence aspects. PsychNology Journal, 10(3), 215-243.