MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANS-ZYGOMATIC AND PTERYGOID IMPLANT SURGERY TECHNIQUE IN THE REHABILITATION OF PATIENTS WITH SEVERE MAXILLARY ATROPHY-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANS-ZYGOMATIC AND PTERYGOID IMPLANT SURGERY TECHNIQUE IN THE REHABILITATION OF PATIENTS WITH SEVERE MAXILLARY ATROPHY

Published:2022-04-22 Issue:1 Volume: Page:19-23
ISSN:2782-4101
Container-title:International journal of Innovative Medicine
language:
Short-container-title:IJIM

Author:

Gladyshev M.¹,Put V.²^ORCID,Dolgaev A.³^ORCID,Gladysheva A.⁴,Kalashnikova O.⁵,Kononov I.¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of oral rehabilitation of the Private Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education Moscow Witte University

2. Department of Oncology radiology and plastic surgery of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)

3. Department of General Practice and Pediatric Dentistry, Stavropol State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

4. Medical Centre «Gladent»

5. Medical clinic «MedSwiss»

Abstract

Angular and trans-zygomatic implants are an alternative to most augmentation procedures on the upper jaw. Priority application of trans-zygomatic, pterygoid and traditional implants on the upper jaw in different techniques and combinations. Extensive possibilities for rehabilitation of patients with severe and extreme atrophy and post-traumatic changes of the upper jaw. Trans-zygomatic implants provide immediate functional loading with prosthetic constructions according to the protocol of intraoperative direct prosthetics. Treatment time, cost and the need for augmentation procedures are reduced. Specialists strive to reduce the risks and invasiveness of techniques by optimising surgical access techniques.

Publisher

Alfmed LLC

Reference23 articles.

1. Nocini PF, D’Agostino A, Chiarini L, Trevisiol L, Procacci P. Simultaneous Le Fort I osteotomy and malar implant placement with delayed prosthetic rehabilitation. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25:1021–4.

2. Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are most successful in providing bone support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(Suppl):49–70.

3. Testori T, Drago L, Wallace S, Capelli M, Galli F. Prevention and management of postoperative infections after sinus elevation surgery: a clinical consensus and recommendations. Int J Dentistry. 2012;2012:365809.

4. Kasabah S, Krug J, Simůnek A, Lecaro MC. Can mucosal perforation of the maxillary sinus be predicted? Acta Med (Hradec Kralove). 2003;46(1):19–23.

5. Danesh-Sani SA, Loomer PM, Wallace SS. A comprehensive clinical review of maxillary sinus ﬂoor elevation: anatomy, techniques, biomaterials and complications. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;54(7):724–30.