Different predicted values — different conclusions?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Different predicted values — different conclusions?

Published:2021-07-06 Issue:15 Volume: Page:22-26
ISSN:2078-5631
Container-title:Medical alphabet
language:
Short-container-title:Medicinskij alfavit

Author:

Struchkov P. V.¹,Kiryukhina D.²,Drozdov D. V.³,Shchelykalina S. P.⁴,Manichev I. A.⁵

Affiliation:

1. Academy of postgraduate education of FMBA Russia; Clinical hospital 85 FMBA Russia

2. St. Petersburg Scientific Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation

3. Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology

4. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RNRMU)

5. Belintelmed LLC

Abstract

The analysis of the differences in the spirometry estimation using different predicted values systems (Clement R.F., ECSC-1993, Knudson R.J, and GLI2012) have been made. The predicted values for volume indicators (FVC and FEV1) calculated using the GLI-2012 system were higher than those of the first three systems, while the flow indicators (FEF25-75 and MEF75), on the contrary, were lower. This difference has led to a different assessment of deviation of normal when using different predicted values systems. This is especially true when the values are near the evaluated areas borders.

Publisher

Alfmed LLC

Subject

Materials Chemistry,Economics and Econometrics,Media Technology,Forestry

Reference14 articles.

1. Pellegrino R., Viegi G., Brucasco V. et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests / Series ‘ATS/ERS Task Force: Standartisation of lung function testing’ // Eur. Resp. J.— 2005.— Vol. 26.— P. 948–968.

2. Guidelines for using the spirometry method. Russian Respiratory Society. Approved by the Ministry of Health of Russia in 2016. M., 2016. 36 p.

3. Kameneva M. Yu. Methodological aspects of the use of pulmonary functional tests // Medical alphabet. Modern functional diagnostics. No. 22/2017. Vol. No. 2. P. 26–31.

4. Struchkov P.V., Drozdov D.V., Lukina O.F. Spirometry. A guide for doctors. 3rd edition. Moscow: GEOTARMedia, 2020. 112 p.

5. Instructions for the use of formulas and tables of the proper values of the main spirographic indicators. Approved. Ministry of Health of the USSR 1986. R. F. Clement, A.A. Lavrushin, P.A. Ter-Pogasyan, Yu.M. Kotegov. L., 1986.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Updated national guidelines for spirometry. Part 2. An Approach to Interpreting Spirometry;Medical alphabet;2024-05-08

2. Effectiveness of comprehensive rehabilitation of patients with impaired respiratory muscle strength after coronavirus pneumonia;Bulletin Physiology and Pathology of Respiration;2024-03-21

3. Spirometry: national guidelines for the testing and interpretation of results Interregional Public Organization “Russian Respiratory Society” All-Russian Public Organization “Russian Association of Specialists in Functional Diagnostics” All-Russian Public Organization “Russian Scientific Medical Society of Therapists”;PULMONOLOGIYA;2023-06-08

4. New international technical standard on interpretive strategies for lung function tests (Part 1);Medical alphabet;2022-10-30