The results of the evaluation of the international testing “Acute reactions in children” among doctors of various specialties

Author:

Pampura Alexander N.ORCID,Esakova Natalia V.ORCID,Dolotova Daria D.ORCID,Zakharova Irina N.ORCID,Plavunov Nikolai F.ORCID,Lekmanov Andrey U.ORCID,Kadyshev Valeriy A.ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is a situation at risk of death; thus, doctors should identify its symptoms and provide emergency assistance. AIMS: This study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of the level of knowledge on anaphylaxis in children among doctors of various specialties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted anonymously using an online questionnaire (Google Forms) among five groups of doctors: allergologists-immunologists, resuscitators-anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, pediatricians, and students of accredited university graduates. The questionnaire included six tasks on anaphylaxis in children and four tasks on other diseases similar to anaphylaxis, and each had two questions (diagnosis and treatment) with three answer options; if one was correct, 1 point was given. RESULTS: A total of 1871 respondents from nine countries filled out the questionnaire correctly. The average score of the allergists on anaphylaxis tasks was the highest (9 of 12 points) in comparison with other groups (p 0.001). The average score on non-anaphylaxis tasks was high in all groups (7 of 8 points). The level of knowledge of respondents did not correlate with age and work experience. In anaphylaxis tasks, allergists made the appropriate diagnosis in 83.7% of cases; resuscitators, pediatricians, and students in 2/3; and emergency physicians in 50%. For the treatment of anaphylaxis, allergists prescribed epinephrine in 66.7% of cases, and other groups in 50%. The percentage of correct answers in the tasks of food anaphylaxis (diagnosis) was the highest among allergists (8096%), compared with other groups (3682%) (p 0.001). In the treatment of food anaphylaxis, allergists prescribed epinephrine more often (up to 85%) than other groups (up to 77%). The percentage of correct responses of drug anaphylaxis among all groups was high; however, resuscitators responded better (diagnosis, 94%; treatment, 64%). All groups had the lowest level of knowledge on idiopathic anaphylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Anaphylaxis can be underdiagnosed in 50% of pediatric cases; however, even with correct diagnosis, epinephrine is not prescribed in half of the cases. Thus, increasing and maintaining the level of knowledge on anaphylaxis among doctors of various specialties, regardless of their length of service, are necessary.

Publisher

Farmarus Print Media

Subject

Immunology,Immunology and Allergy

Reference23 articles.

1. Anaphylaxis and ethnicity: higher incidence in British South Asians

2. Global Trends in Anaphylaxis Epidemiology and Clinical Implications

3. World Allergy Organization Anaphylaxis Guidance 2020

4. EAACI guidelines: Anaphylaxis (2021 update)

5. Clinical recommendations. Anaphylactic shock. The Russian Association of Allergologists and Clinical Immunologists, Federation of Anesthesiologists and Resuscitators; 2020. 36 р. (In Russ).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3