Abstract
This paper attempts to explore the production of an exegesis
of written output by a civil bureaucracy, and to compare this output
over two periods of governance. On the one part was the British
bureaucracy in the Indus region, but more especially the Punjab, during
British rule; and on the other the bureaucracy in Pakistan after 1947.
The intention of the paper is to analyse the problematic of governance
from a somewhat different approach, and one which to the author’s
knowledge has yet not been undertaken, in our efforts to understand the
power dynamics that have moulded the contours of governance in the Indus
region in modern times. I have attempted elsewhere an analysis of these
processes and developments.1 Therefore, rather than revisit these
materials and arguments, I will suggest here a complementary yet
distinct perspective for probing into the complexities of power and
governance in this region. The question to be posed is whether, and how,
could the emergence of a descriptive and analytical written discourse,
by public officials, itself become the articulation of a narrative of
power, authority and control. Moreover, in comparing the two periods, we
might be able to glean some insights into the capability needs of public
management and local and national governance systems, in addressing the
challenging political and socio-economic environment facing contemporary
Pakistan. These are huge areas of analysis, and mostly uncharted ones.
The present paper can only hope to raise some relevant questions, and
suggest some pertinent, if tentative, answers.
Publisher
Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE)
Subject
Development,Geography, Planning and Development
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献