Author:
Ahmed Ather Maqsood,Hyder Asma
Abstract
Ever since the pioneering work on human capital modeling by
Becker (1964) and Mincer (1974), estimation of earning potential and
wage differentials in terms of differences in human capital endowments
has been a favourite topic of research throughout the world. The
empirical evidence has established, may be beyond doubt, that low
returns are usually associated with low-level of human capital possessed
by economic agents. Using appropriate controls for innate abilities,
education, experience and training as primary determinants of human
capital, the residual differential in wages among differentiated groups
(on the basis of gender, race, and region) has often been characterised
as discrimination [Blinder (1973) and Oaxaca (1973)]. The empirical
estimation made further advances when the issue of sample selection bias
was also settled by Heckman (1980). More recently the focus of research
has shifted from differentials measured at the conditional mean
(average) value to measurement at different points of wage distribution
to test the ‘glass ceiling and sticky floor’ hypothesis.1 Some of the
studies where quantile regression approach of Koenker and Bassett (1978)
and Buchinsky (1998) has been adopted include Bjorklund and Vroman
(2001), Dolado and Llorens (2004), and Albrecht, Vuuren, and Vroman
(2004). On the basis of this research, the glass ceiling hypothesis has
received fair amount of empirical support in much of the developed
world. On the other hand, the sticky floor hypothesis has only been
observed in some of the countries located in the southern Europe. The
focus of present study is on Pakistan with three main objectives. First,
to investigate if analysis at the conditional mean is sufficient to
explain wage differential or an extensive work covering different points
of wage distribution is required to have proper insight to the issue.
This would, in turn, enable us to determine which of the two hypotheses,
i.e., the glass ceiling or the sticky floor, is prevalent in the
country? For this purpose, gender wage differentials at different
quantiles, i.e., 10th, 25th, median,
Publisher
Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE)
Subject
Development,Geography, Planning and Development
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献