Author:
Javid Attiya Y.,Arif Umaima,Sattar Abdul
Abstract
There are two competing views of the interaction between
monetary and fiscal policy and their effects on price stability for
policy-maker’s point of view. In the classical view, in Ricardian
regimes it is the demand for liquidity and its evolution over time that
determines prices. In such a regime fiscal policy is passive, which
implies that government bonds are not net wealth [Barro (1974)], and
monetary policy works through the interest rate or another instrument to
determine prices. In the opposite view which is more recent, a
non-Ricardian regime will prevail whenever fiscal policy becomes active1
and does not accommodate or adjust primary surpluses to guarantee fiscal
solvency. As a result, the Ricardian equivalence do not hold, and the
increase in nominal public debt to finance persistent budget deficits is
perceived by private agents as an increase in nominal wealth. In fiscal
dominant regime the government’s fiscal policy becomes sustainable
through debt deflation that is an increase in prices that wash away the
real value of public debt and in turn the real value of financial wealth
until demand equals supply and a new equilibrium is reached. In this
regime prices are determined by fiscal policy, and inflation becomes a
fiscal phenomenon. If, on the other hand, primary surpluses follow an
arbitrary process, then the equilibrium path of prices is determined by
the requirement known as fiscal solvency; that is, the price level has
to jump to satisfy a present value budget constraint called
non-Ricardian regime. The basic distinction between the two regimes is
that in non-Ricardian regime fiscal policy plays the role where as in
Ricardian regime monetary policy provides stability in prices. In FTPL,
the results of fiscal and monetary policies depend on which policy has
dominant characteristics. The consequences of policies differ depending
on the active and passive characteristics of the policy and depending on
the characteristics of the following policy. If the policy mix is such
that monetary policy is active and fiscal policy is passive, fiscal
policy accommodates monetary policies; these policies are called
dominant monetary policy by Sargent and Wallace (1981) and Ricardian
regime by Woodford (1994, 1995).
Publisher
Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE)
Subject
Development,Geography, Planning and Development
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献