Abstract
Privatisation has begun to accelerate in India and Pakistan.
However, it is not clear that a change in ownership per se will
contribute significantly to a more rapid, efficient, and equitable
growth unless policies that ensure competition for these enterprises and
remove distortions in factor markets also are undertaken at the same
time or prior to privatisation. After a brief discussion of the
transition from state-led development to more market-oriented policies
and gradual opening to world markets, this paper reviews some of the
analytical literature on privatisation and regulation. The translation
of these theories into concrete policy suggestions is difficult for
countries such as Pakistan and India, where many of the assumptions
behind the theories do not hold. However, the results of empirical
studies on past privatisations around the world do hold lessons for
South Asia. Similarly, theories of regulation offer only broad
recommendations, most notably (for South Asia) that regulation is not
the best way to redistribute resources. The final section of the paper
reviews India’s and Pakistan’s experience with privatisation thus far.
Attempted privatisation of electricity in India serves as an example of
the need for more attention to regulation, while the transfer of
ownership has led to better service at lower cost in the
telecommunications sector. Pakistan’s privatisation programme appears to
have had similarly mixed results, though it is difficult to come to firm
conclusions with the evidence at hand.
Publisher
Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE)
Subject
Development,Geography, Planning and Development
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献