Abstract
The leafcutting bees of theleachellagroup of Megachile Latreille subgenus Eutricharaea Thomson are revised for the Western Palaearctic region using a combination of morphology and phylogenetic analyses of three genes (COI, LW-Rhodopsin, CAD). Although only seven species are recognized, much effort was needed to link delimitated taxonomic units to taxon names because of the difficulties in identifying type specimens. Numerous types were in a poor state of conservation, preventing straight-forward identification using morphology. This was in some cases aggravated by the fact that they often belonged to a sex that could not easily be identified; one type was a gynandromorph specimen whose identification is even more challenging. In several cases, the type locality was vague or unclear; in three cases, the type specimens originated from introduced populations for which the source of the introduction needed to be determined using DNA barcoding. In two cases, the type specimens consisted of several body parts not originating from a single individual but from two heterospecific specimens. We argue that this tedious nomenclatural work would have been greatly facilitated if a reference library of type specimens had been available. Our revision leads to the following taxonomic changes.Megachile argentata(Fabricius, 1793), described from northern Africa and with a convoluted taxonomic history, is demonstrated, based on morphometric analyses of its lectotype, to be conspecific with the species hitherto known asM. pilidensAlfken, 1924. After discussing and excluding several alternative options that would minimize nomenclatural changes, we placeM. pilidensin synonymy withM. argentata(syn. nov.). Two new subspecies are described for morphologically slightly divergent insular populations,M. leachella creticaPraz,ssp. nov.from Crete, andM. leachella densipunctataPraz,ssp. nov.from Cyprus. In addition,M. albipilaPérez, 1895 is treated as a subspecies ofM. leachellaCurtis, 1828 (stat. nov.). The following new synonymies are proposed:M. compactaPérez, 1895 (notM. compactaSmith, 1879) and the replacement nameM. crassulaPérez, 1896,M. argyreaCockerell, 1931 andPerezia mauraFerton, 1914, are placed in synonymy withM. argentata(syn. nov.).M. beaumontiBenoist, 1951, is newly treated as a valid species (stat. rev.).M. schmiedeknechtiCosta, 1884 is treated as a subspecies ofM. argentata(stat. nov.), andM. xanthopygaPérez, 1895 is placed in synonymy withM. argentata schmiedeknechti(syn. nov.).M. bioculataPérez, 1902,M. discriminataRebmann, 1968 andM. ichnusaeRebmann, 1968 are placed in synonymy withM. leachella(syn. nov.).M. variscopaPérez, 1895,M. timberlakeiCockerell, 1920,M. atratulaRebmann, 1968,M. striatellaRebmann, 1968 andM. sudaiIkudome, 1999 are placed in synonymy withM. pusillaPérez, 1894. Lectotypes are designated forM. albipila,M. bioculata,M. compactaPérez,M. pusilla, M. variscopaandM. xanthopyga.
Subject
Insect Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference107 articles.
1. Image Processing with ImageJ.;Abramoff;Biophotonics International,2004
2. Przyczynek do znajomošci kilku gatunków z grupy Megachile argentata. Zur Kenntnis einiger Arten der Megachile argentata-Gruppe. Rozprawy i Wiadomości z Muzeum im.;Alfken;Dzieduszyckich,1924
3. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Bienenfauna von Ägypten.;Alfken;Senckenbergiana,1926
4. Apidae 4: Anthidium, Chelostoma, Coelioxys, Dioxys, Heriades, Lithurgus, Megachile, Osmia, Stelis.;Amiet;Fauna Helvetica, CSCF/SEG (Neuchâtel),2004
5. On Palaearctic and Oriental species of the genera Pseudapis W.F. Kirby, 1900, and Nomiapis Cockerell, 1919 (Hymenoptera, Halictidae, Nomiinae).