Cardioand neuroprotection with volatile anesthetics in cardiac surgery

Author:

Borisov K. Yu.,Levikov D. I.,Grebenchikov O. A.,Likhvantsev V. V.,Shaybakova V. L.,Cherpakov R. A.

Abstract

The researcher's opinions about myocardial and brain anesthetic preconditioning efficiency are yet contradictive. In addition, the anesthetic neuroprotection phenomenon is poorly investigated. In this study the authors attempted to evaluate the efficiency of myocardial and central nervous system (CNS) protection by using a modified method of volatile induction and maintenance of anesthesia (VIMA) based on pulse-like sevoflurane dosing that excludes propofol usage. Ninety CABG patients aged 45-75 years were included in the study group (VIMA) and underwent volatile induction with sevoflurane and anesthetic preconditioning (2 MAC) for 10 min before aortic cross-clamping, with ataralgesia used during CPB. The control group patients (TIVA) received propofol and fentanyl, no inhalation anesthetics were applied. Preoperative concentrations of NTpro-BNP were comparable. There was no significant rise of NTpro-BNP concentration in the VIMA group during the postoperative period. In the TIVA group NTpro-BNP concentrations were 3.8 and 4.8 times as much as the baseline values at 24 and 48 postoperative hours respectively (р<0.05). 17 patients in the VIMA group needed dopamine infusion during 24 postoperative hours, this number was 1.7 times less than that in the TIVA group (23 patients) (р<0.05). VIMA patients had 2-fold lower troponin T concentration in 24 hours after surgery (р<0.01). Significant differences in protein S100B concentrations were observed only during the postoperative period. No significant differences in cognitive functions of the patients from both groups were identified before surgery. On postoperative day 2 MMSE scale count was significantly lower in TIVA patients (20.843.73) in comparison with VI-MA patients (23.364.34) (р<0.05). Thus, the modified VIMA technique with sevoflurane has a greater neuroprotective potential during CABG with CPB and provides better preservation of myocardium structural integrity and cardiac performance than fentanyl/4propofol-based TIVA would do.

Publisher

Institute of Circulation Pathology

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,Physiology,Surgery

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3