Abstract
Background. Combined radiation therapy is the «gold standard» for the treatment of stages IIB-IVA of cervical cancer (cervical cancer). Given the data of statistical indicators of cervical cancer, the study of new approaches to treatment and implementation in clinical practice of modern technologies of radiation therapy of widespread cervical cancer is an extremely important area.
Purpose – evaluate the benefits of using CT topometric preparation in planning brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
Materials and Methods. 3D planning of brachytherapy of 24 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO IIIB stage), who underwent a radical program of combined radiation therapy (remote radiation therapy with chemical modification with cisplatin followed by HDR-brachytherapy (High dose rate brachytherapy)).
Results. The paper presents the results of the analysis of differences in brachytherapy planning according to orthogonal images and CT images. The analysis of the influence of the constitutional features of patients revealed that there are differences in the topographic anatomy of the pelvis depending on the surface area of the body. In patients with a body surface area of up to 1,65 m2 , a more intimate fit of the intestine to the target volume of irradiation was noted. No similar planning difficulties were found in patients with a body surface area above 1,65 m2 .
Conclusions. The use of 3D images in the planning of intracavitary irradiation in patients with cervical cancer provides precision brachytherapy by simultaneously visualizing the irradiated volumes and spatial relationships of the anatomical structures of the pelvis, the introduced endostats and the corresponding volumetric dose distributions.
Publisher
Institute for Medical Radiology and Oncology of NAMS of Ukraine
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology,Education,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Reference9 articles.
1. Cancer in Ukraine, 2019–2020. Morbidity, mortality, performance of the oncology service. Bulletin of the National Cancer Registry of Ukraine № 22. 2021;50. (In Ukrainian).
2. Chino J, Annunziata CM, Beriwal S, Bradfield L, Erickson BA, Fields EC et al. Radiation therapy for cervical cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Practical Radiation Oncology. 2020;10(4):220–34. (In English). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2020.04.002
3. Reyes Santiago DK, Khadzhimba AS, Smirnova MP, Maksimov SYa. The role of the surgical stage in the combined treatment of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Issues of oncology. 2019;65(5):749–55. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2019-65-5-749-755
4. EMBRACE: An International Study on MRI-guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. EMBRACE Study Committee. (In English). URL: https://www.embracestudy.dk/About.aspx
5. Potter R, Knocke TH, Fellner C et al. Definitive radiotherapy based on HDR brachytherapy with iridium192 in uterine cervix carcinoma: report on the Vienna University Hospital findings (1993–1997) соmpared to the preceding period in the context of ICRU 38 recommendations. Cancer Radiotherapy. 2000;4:159–72. (In English).