Abstract
This review explores how sociolinguistics expands our understanding of second language acquisition (SLA) by drawing upon two typical sociolinguistic strands: the variationist approach and the investment perspective. Accordingly, two empirical studies are used to illustrate the contributions of each strand, with Han’s (2019) study adopting a variationist approach and Sung’s (2020) study taking an investment perspective. Through a critical analysis, this paper argues that both theoretical strands contribute to the “social turn” of SLA by providing different insights into the social shaping of second language (L2) knowledge and learning, as well as the interplay between identity construction and L2 learning. Implications, limitations, and suggestions for future studies are discussed at the end.
Reference36 articles.
1. Al-khresheh, M. H. (2016). A review study of contrastive analysis theory. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(6), 330-338. https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-2.6.5
2. Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Georgetown University Press, 3240 Prospect Street, NW, Washington, DC 20007.
3. Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual
4. review of applied linguistics, 35, 36-56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000191
5. Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2017). Language, identity, and investment in the twenty-first century. Language policy and political issues in education, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02320-5_18-2