A corpus-based study to evaluate the generativist explanation of children’s error patterns in questions

Author:

Du YiranORCID

Abstract

This study explores whether the generativist account, specifically the integration theory, could explain children’s percentage of errors in questions in general and whether it also applies to yes-no and non-subject wh-question. The current study adopts a corpus-based method to compare 2-to-3-year-old children’s percentages of errors in questions (and in yes-no and wh-question separately) including auxiliary DO and auxiliary HAVE. The results show that children’s rate of errors in questions including auxiliary DO is higher than that including auxiliary HAVE, which is also applicable to yes-no and non-subject wh-questions. The findings indicate that the generativist theory of child language acquisition could successfully explain children’s patterns of errors in questions. This study also emphasises the impact of the question type which should be carefully considered when constructing and improving the generativist theory of child question formation. The study provides empirical evidence for improving and refining the generativist account of child language acquisition generally and language question acquisition specifically.

Publisher

Pioneer Publications

Reference66 articles.

1. Ambridge, B., Rowland, C. F., Theakston, A. L., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Comparing different accounts of inversion errors in children’s non-subject wh-questions: ‘What experimental data can tell us?’ Journal of Child Language, 33(3), 519–557. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000906007513

2. Babyonyshev, M., Ganger, J., Pesetsky, D., & Wexler, K. (2001). The Maturation of Grammatical Principles: Evidence from Russian Unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 32(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438901554577

3. Bellugi, U. (1965). The Development of Interrogative Structures in Children’s Speech. In K. Riegel (Ed.), The development of language functions (pp. 103–138). University of Michigan.

4. Bellugi, U. (1971). Simplification in children’s language. In R. Huxley & E. Ingram (Eds.), Language acquisition: Models and methods (pp. 95–119). Academic Press.

5. Bloom, P. (1990). Subjectless Sentences in Child Language. Linguistic Inquiry, 21(4), 491–504.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3