Manipulative potential of verbal representations in American political discourse

Author:

Stepanova Ekaterina Vladimirovna1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Volgograd Institute of Management, branch of RANEPA

Abstract

The paper provides a comparative analysis of quantitative and qualitative verbal representations of various population groups in American political speeches on the topic of the Palestinian-Israeli and Russian-Ukrainian conflicts in two chronological periods from February 2022 to October 6, 2023 and from October 7, 2022 to the end of November 2023. The aim of the work is to highlight manipulative tactics and methods of pragmatic influence on addressees in America in various population groups, taking into account the quantity and quality of verbal representations and means of naming over time. The scientific novelty of the work is due to the results of identifying quantitative and qualitative differences in verbal representations and means of naming representatives of population groups in four countries, manipulative techniques and means of pragmatic influence based on the material of modern public speeches of US political leaders in the two chronological periods. As a result of the study, 1) quantitative differences in names and verbal representations of various population groups were identified; 2) recurring qualitative differences in their verbal representations were discovered: “slaughtered”, “massacred”, “murdered”, “butchered” – in relation to the losses of Israelis, “killed”, “died” – those of Ukrainians, “loss of life”, “loss”, “targets”, “annihilate” – those of Palestinians; 3) typical manipulative tactics of omission, leveling of facts, contrasting “good – evil”, as well as the characteristic expressive language means of their implementation, i.e., repetitions, amplifications, superlatives, evaluative vocabulary, selective names, antithesis, were found.

Publisher

Gramota Publishing

Reference10 articles.

1. Беляевская Е. Г. Концептуальный анализ: результат, на который обычно не обращают внимания // Когнитивные исследования языка. 2022. № 4 (51).

2. Карасик В. И. Адресатная специализация в публичном политическом дискурсе // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Теория языка. Семиотика. Семантика. 2018. № 1.

3. Мищук О. Н. Речевое воздействие в политическом дискурсе // Известия Тульского государственного университета. Гуманитарные науки. 2013. № 1.

4. Степанова Н. В. Лингвостилистические средства актуализации дискредитирующих тактик в жанре американских политических дебатов // Филологические науки. Вопросы теории и практики. 2023. Т. 16. Вып. 1.

5. Сюе Ю. Методы исследования политического дискурса в контексте цифровизации гуманитарных наук // Политическая лингвистика. 2023. № 1 (97).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3