The GI ethos as a part of the US cultural code (as exemplified by precedent texts of the military sublanguage)

Author:

Romanov Alexander Sergeevich1,Dmitry Vladimirovich Balaganov2,Muravleva Valeria Romanovna3

Affiliation:

1. Moscow’s MGIMO University

2. Russian State University for the Humanities

3. Moscow Power Engineering Institute

Abstract

The paper scrutinizes professional image of the American serviceman’s world from the axiological perspective. It focuses on US national values as well as the moral and ethical image of the military cohort. The object of the study is the axiosphere of the US military society expressed in the official register of the military sublanguage. The subject area of our research embraces precedent texts of military officialese, which set forth the basis of military ethos. This research aims to identify unique value orientations attributed to the US military cohort’s members. On the one hand, these values constitute the professional ethos and, on the other hand, however, they collide with generally accepted axiological standards of the civilian mother culture. The scientific novelty of the study consists in the fact that the comparison of maternal culture values and the values of its socio-professional group of service members is conducted for the first time. Despite the abundance of publications on this issue (mainly works in sociology, psychology, medicine, and history), the phenomenon of the identity of a serviceman’s professional ethos is still insufficiently examined from the standpoint of linguocultural studies and sociolinguistics. The research findings demonstrated a partial identity of the value orientations compared. The professional environment reveals a number of values that are largely not inherent in the “civilian world”. The latter include messianism, a sense of belonging to the highest values of the nation, sacrifice of military service, collective spirit (esprit de corps), and others. This paper represents the first attempt to dissect the axiosphere of the GI through textual works of officialese. The contrastive analysis allowed us to identify the key values declared by the US defense establishment.

Publisher

Gramota Publishing

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference22 articles.

1. Барт Р. Мифологии / пер. с фр., вступ. ст. и коммент. С. Зенкина. М.: Академический Проект, 2008.

2. Бойко Б. Л. Основы теории социально-групповых диалектов: автореф. дисс. … д. филол. н. М., 2009.

3. Коровушкин В. П. Основы контрастивной социолектологии: монография: в 2-х ч. Череповец: ГОУ ВПО ЧГУ, 2005. Ч. I.

4. Лосев А. Ф. Диалектика мифа. М.: АСТ, 2021.

5. Романов А. С. Стереотипизация субкультурных констант в аксиологии социально-группового диалекта (на материале ценностей и реалий военной службы в языковой культуре США): дисс. … д. филол. н. М., 2020.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3