Literary mystifications and the authorial use of numerals

Author:

Zenkov Andrei Viacheslavovich1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ural Federal University

Abstract

This study pertains to stylometry. There are cases when a writer who has achieved fame, for various reasons, begins to create under a different name, attempts to write in a different manner and sometimes achieves success again in a new incarnation. The aim of the study is to test the feasibility of intentionally making significant changes to an author’s literary style. Numerals present in the texts by a particular author are used as a style marker. Examples from English, French and Russian literature demonstrate that the use of numerals is a literary ‘fingerprint’ that manifests in all or most of sufficiently long texts by that author. The obtained results show that, contrary to an author’s attempts to write in a ‘new’ way, the usage of numerals is conservative and allows for the recognition of fictitious authorship. This conclusion is drawn based on the analysis of works by R. Gary and B. Akunin (G. Chkhartishvili), who are known for their literary hoaxes. The analysis of numerals usage is also applied to the issue of authorship regarding Harper Lee’s novel ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’. Conclusions about the similarity/difference of literary styles are made based on hierarchical cluster analysis and are supported by the Pearson chi-squared test. The scientific originality of the paper lies in taking a new approach to the search for a literary ‘fingerprint’ and text attribution.

Publisher

Gramota Publishing

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference20 articles.

1. Artinian A. Maupassant Criticism in France, 1880-1940, with an Inquiry into His Present Fame and a Bibliography. N. Y.: Kings Crown Press, 1941.

2. Benford F. The Law of Anomalous Numbers // Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 1938. Vol. 78. No. 4.

3. Boisen J. Un Picaro métaphysique: Romain Gary et l’art du roman. Odense: Odense University Press, 1996.

4. Brocardo M. L., Traore I., Woungang I., Obaidat M. S. Authorship Verification Using Deep Belief Network Systems // International Journal of Communication Systems. 2017. Vol. 30. Iss. 12. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.3259

5. Burns B. D. Do People Fit to Benford’s Law, or Do They Have a Benford Bias? 2020. https://cognitivesciencesociety.org/cogsci20/papers/0379/index.html

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3