Experimental Music and the Political: Performativity in the art of John Cage

Author:

Lomnitz Ricardo

Abstract

This text aims to explore some of the philosophical inquiries that arise from experimental music, focusing on the following question: How is music, without words, capable of producing and enacting political thought? Focusing on John Cage's art an exploration of the performativity of music is proposed, understanding performativity both as the effects that music has on its audience, and its “theatrical” quality. Cage’s work is especially well suited for this objective, inasmuch as it is based upon both an explicit desire to modify the perception of its audience, and an interest in developing an art form that is closer to “theatre” (in a broad sense). As Alejandro L. Madrid has suggested, using performativity as a lens of analysis to study music shifts the question “What is music?” to “What does music do?” and “What does it allow people to do?” Through a revision and discussion of Cage’s art pieces, the author of this text argues that Cage’s work supposes a destabilization of traditional notions and roles, allowing people to listen to their surroundings with greater attention and pleasure (thus questioning Eurocentric and anthropocentric conceptual and sensorial frameworks inherited from the past), and to perform atypical social relations of an anarchist nature.

Publisher

Performance Philosophy

Subject

Pharmacology (medical)

Reference40 articles.

1. Anderson, Vaughn. 2017. "'Revision of the Golden Rule': John Cage, Latin America, and the Poetics of Non-Interventionism." Journal of Modern Literature 41 (1): 58-80. https://doi.org/10.2979/jmodelite.41.1.05

2. Artaud, Antonin. (1938) 2013. The Theatre and Its Double. Translated by Victor Corti. London: Alma Classics.

3. Attali, Jacques. (1977) 2009. Noise. The Political Economy of Music. Translated by Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

4. Austin, J. L. 1962. How To Do Things With Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

5. Barret, G. Douglas. 2013. "The Limits of Performing Cage: Ultra-red's SILENTLISTEN." Postmodern Culture 23 (2): n.p. https://doi.org/10.1353/pmc.2013.0034

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3