Mechanical versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 50 to 70 Years-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Mechanical versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 50 to 70 Years

Published:2024-03-13 Issue:3 Volume:57 Page:242-251
ISSN:2765-1606
Container-title:Journal of Chest Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:J Chest Surg

Author:

Song Youngkwan¹^ORCID,Kim Ki Tae¹^ORCID,Park Soo Jin¹^ORCID,Kim Hong Rae¹^ORCID,Yoo Jae Suk¹^ORCID,Kang Pil Je¹^ORCID,Jung Sung-Ho¹^ORCID,Chung Cheol Hyun¹^ORCID,Kim Joon Bum¹^ORCID,Kim Ho Jin¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Publisher

Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Link

https://pdf.medrang.co.kr/KTCVS2/2024/057/jcs-57-3-242.pdf

Reference32 articles.

1. Prosthetic Heart Valves

2. Choice of Prosthetic Heart Valve in Adults

3. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age

4. Surgical valve selection in the era of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database

5. Meta-Analysis of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Redo-surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Failed Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Commentary: The Never-Ending Debate on the Type of Aortic Prosthesis in Patients Aged 50–70, as TAVR Peaks in Popularity: Which Prosthesis Should Be Used for Aortic Valve Replacement?;Journal of Chest Surgery;2024-05-05