Affiliation:
1. Minsk Scientific and Practical Center for Surgery, Transplantology and Hematology; Belarusian State Medical University
2. Belarusian State Medical University
3. Minsk Scientific and Practical Center for Surgery, Transplantology and Hematology
Abstract
Purpose of a study: to explore the main methods of evaluating the aesthetic results of autologous breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap (deep inferior epigastric artery perforator), to identify the key factors influencing the aesthetic result of breast reconstruction.The scientific papers in the databases PubMed, Google Scholar, SCOPUS, Science Direct, RSCI for the period from 2013 to 2023 were analyzed. The systematic review includes articles evaluating the aesthetic result of breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap. The search was carried out by keywords: “breast”, “DIEP flap”, “aesthetic result”, “symmetry of breast”.As a result of the analysis, it was found that the evaluation of the aesthetic results of breast reconstruction is carried out using data of patient reported outcome measures, scales which is used to rate the surgeon’s perception of the aesthetic outcomes and quantitative objective measurements. The key factor influencing the aesthetic result of reconstruction is the symmetry of the breasts.Conclusion. The most commonly used methods for assessing the aesthetic results of breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap are: self-assessment of the results of reconstruction by patients (BREAST-Q questionnaire), evaluation of the results by surgeons (professional aesthetic assessment scales), quantitative objective methods for determining the degree of symmetry. According to many studies, symmetry is a critical factor affecting the aesthetics of the breasts and, consequently, patient satisfaction with the results of reconstruction, psychosocial well-being and quality of life in the long term.
Publisher
Research Institute of Microsurgery
Reference50 articles.
1. Ghoncheh M., Pournamdar Z., Salehiniya H. Incidence and Mortality and Epidemiology of Breast Cancer in the World. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(S3):43-6. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2016.17.s3.43. PMID: 27165206
2. Azamjah N., Soltan-Zadeh Y., Zayeri F. Global Trend of Breast Cancer Mortality Rate: A 25-Year Study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Jul 1;20(7):2015-2020. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.7.2015. PMID: 31350959; PMCID: PMC6745227
3. Balmaganbetova F.K., Nurgaliyeva R.E., Tukhvatshin R.R., Zheksenova A.N., Kaldybaeva A.T., et al. Sovremennye aspekty epidemiologii raka molochnoy zhelezy: obzor literatury [Modern aspects of breast cancer epidemiology: A literature review]. Zapadno-Kazakhstanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal – West Kazakhstan Medical Journal. 2020;2(62):125-133 (in Russ.).
4. Loibl S., Poortmans P., Morrow M., Denkert C., Curigliano G. Breast cancer. Lancet. 2021 May 8;397 (10286): 1750-1769. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32381-3. Epub 2021 Apr 1. Erratum in: Lancet. 2021 May 8;397(10286): 1710. PMID: 33812473
5. Wöckel A., Albert U.S., Janni W., Scharl A., Kreienberg R., Stüber T. The Screening, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Breast Cancer. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 May 4;115(18):316-323. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0316. PMID: 29807560; PMCID: PMC5987060