Toward Understanding Impacts of Virtual Visits on Accreditation Review Effectiveness, Quality, and Best Practices

Author:

Haughery John R.1,Doggett A. Mark2,Mosher Gretchen A3,Hildebrant Jake4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Applied Engineering, Safety and Technology, Millersville University of Pennsylvania

2. School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Western Kentucky University

3. Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University

4. School of Engineering, Murray State University

Abstract

Accreditation standards and criteria motivate much of the efforts to continuously improve public higher education institutions in the United States. A key mechanism in this accreditation process for many agencies is an onsite physical visitation of the institution and/or program by an accreditation visiting team. This visit can provide tangible information, observation, and characterization of the institution or program under review, which informs a final accreditation decision. Due to the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and the ensuing travel and physical distancing protocols, many accrediting agencies were required to hold traditional onsite visits virtually during the spring of 2020.Not only was this an ad hoc transition, but it was also made without full knowledge of the impact that the shift in evaluation mode would have on the effectiveness and quality of accreditation reviews against accreditation standards and criteria. Therefore, a critical need exists to evaluate the efficacy of the virtual mode of accreditation review. This study analyzed the impacts of virtual site visits on accreditation review effectiveness and quality. Using survey data collected from the Association of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering (ATMAE)’s Board of Accreditation, from visiting team members, and from institutional contacts involved in the 2020 accreditation visits, an assessment of the effectiveness and quality of accreditation reviews was performed. Qualitatively, strong themes were found in the data set revealing the impacts of the virtual modality on accreditation review effectiveness and quality; advantages, disadvantages, and opportunities to leverage the remote modality were also discovered and are highlighted. Quantitatively, the virtual modality was overwhelmingly reported to be effective for most accreditation standards, whereas impacts on quality were more negligible. The results of this study help characterize the impacts on accreditation amid the COVID-19 pandemic, provide a picture of lessons learned from the use of this modality, and begin to lay a preliminary foundation for best practices for future virtual accreditation site visits.

Publisher

Iowa State University

Subject

General Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3