Direct and indirect effect of European Uniondirectives in the context of European UnionCourt of Justice decisions

Author:

Burak Stepan1ORCID,Bratsuk Ivan1ORCID,Gutnyk Vitalii1ORCID,Petrenko Yuliia2ORCID,Yavorska Iryna1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine.

2. Poltava University of Economics and Trade, Ukraine.

Abstract

The objective of this article is to analyze the direct effect of EU directives in vertical and horizontal legal relationships as well as theindirect effect of EU directivesin the context of EU Court of Justice decisions. In particular, attention is paid to the study of the consolidated legal positions regarding the possibility of the “verticaldirecteffect”, “horizontaldirecteffect” and “indirect effect”of EU directives.Dialectical, comparative-legal, historical, and formal dogmatic methods were used in the research.As the resultof analyzewas made the conclusion that the EU directives, which are used by national courts to fulfill their obligations regarding the respective interpretation, can not be considered with direct effect, because in such disputes they serve as a means of determiningthe scope of other legal provisions that the national court treats or interprets. In such situations, the directive may be applied in cases indirectly, that is, by virtue of another (national) provision, as interpreted.

Publisher

Universidad del Zulia

Subject

Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. Bobek, M. (2014). The Effects of EU Law in the National Legal Systems. In: C. Barnard and S. Peers, S. (eds.). European Union Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press

2. Case 106/89 “Marleasing S.A v. La Commercial International De Alimentacion S. A.” (1990). Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61989CJ0106

3. Case 14/83 “Sabine von Colson and Elisabeth Kamann v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen” (1984). Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61983CJ0014

4. Case 148/78 “Pubblico Ministero v. Ratti” (1979). Retrieved from: https://eur- lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:61978CJ0148&from=EN

5. Case 303/98 “SIMAP v Valencia Sindicato de Médicos Assistencia Pública” (2000). Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61998CJ0303

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3