Strategic Assessment of the Impact of Forestry on the Environment to Achieve Sustainable Development-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Strategic Assessment of the Impact of Forestry on the Environment to Achieve Sustainable Development

Published:2023-12-31 Issue:42 Volume:15 Page:322-336
ISSN:0041-8811
Container-title:Revista de la Universidad del Zulia
language:es
Short-container-title:RDLUZ

Author:

Oshurkevych-Pankivska Oksana¹^ORCID,Pankivskyi Yurii¹^ORCID,Zadorozhnyy Andriy²^ORCID,Reznichenko Vita³^ORCID,Kolomiiets Liudmila³^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ukrainian National Forestry University, Lviv, Ukraine.

2. State Higher University "Uzhhorod National University", Uzhgorod, Ukraine.

3. Central Ukrainian National Technical University, Kropyvnytskyi, Ukraine.

Abstract

The relevance of the proposed topic is driven by global climate change and the urgent need to optimize the management of natural resources. Forests play a central role in the global carbon balance and are of great socio-economic importance for local communities. The research aims to analyze forest management strategies and their environmental impacts. The study focuses on forest ecosystems in different regions and climatic zones. The methodology is based on a comprehensive analysis of scientific literature, statistical data, and the examination of practical examples. The article highlights the dynamics of forest ecosystem restoration following different types of forestry interventions in different climatic zones, including the Ukrainian context. The impact of forest management on global carbon balances and the socio-economic sphere is assessed. The research shows that adaptive strategies can contribute to sustainable development and biodiversity conservation. The conclusions provide recommendations for the implementation of these strategies at the national level, especially in Ukraine.

Publisher

Universidad del Zulia

Reference33 articles.

1. Aguilar, F. X., Mirzaee, A., McGarvey, R. G., et al. (2020). Expansion of US wood pellet industry points to positive trends but the need for continued monitoring. Scientific Reports, 10, 18607. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75403-z

2. Babst, F., Friend, A. D., Karamihalaki, M., Wei, J., et al. (2020). Modeling ambitions outpace observations of forest carbon allocation. Opinion 26(3), 210-219. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2020.10.002

3. Bugmann, H., Seidl, R., Hartig, F., Bohn, F., Brůna, J., et al. (2019). Tree mortality submodels drive simulated long-term forest dynamics: assessing 15 models from the stand to global scale. Ecosphere, 10(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2616

4. Burrascano, S., Chytrý, M., Kuemmerle, T., Giarrizzo, E., et al. (2016). Current European policies are unlikely to jointly foster carbon sequestration and protect biodiversity. Biological Conservation, 201, 370-376. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.005

5. Charru, M., Seynave, I., Hervé, J. C., et al. (2017). Recent growth changes in Western European forests are driven by climate warming and structured across tree species climatic habitats. Annals of Forest Science, 74(33). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-017- 0626-1