Prerequisites for a Supreme Court to Overrule its Binding Legal Opinions-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Prerequisites for a Supreme Court to Overrule its Binding Legal Opinions

Published:2023-09-07 Issue:41 Volume:14 Page:593-610
ISSN:0041-8811
Container-title:Revista de la Universidad del Zulia
language:es
Short-container-title:RDLUZ

Author:

Doiar Yevhenii¹^ORCID,Liutikov Pavlo¹^ORCID,Lipynskyi Vladyslav²^ORCID,Kantor Nataliya³^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Customs and Finance, Dnipro, Ukraine.

2. University of Customs and Finance, Ukraine.

3. Drohobych State Pedagogical University, Drohobych, Ukraine.

Abstract

The paper aims at developing recommendations for improving procedural laws and guiding case law related to reasons for a supreme court to overrule its universally binding legal opinions with a particular emphasis on relevant Ukrainian legal context as a perfectly illustrative example. This research purpose prompts the reliance on a set of appropriate scientific methods of descriptive and comparative law research including the comparative analysis itself as a fundamental instrument for review of relevant legal material, as well as the structural, analytical and law-in-context scientific methods. The paper covers, in particular, a)Ukrainian statutory framework and case law regulating of the Supreme Court of Ukraine's departure from its legal opinions; b)concepts of overrulingprecedents of the highest courts of the most developed countries with common law legal system; c)current views of scientific community and prospects of development of the relevant case lawon Supreme Court of Ukraineoverruling its legal opinions.The authors maintain that it is extremely important to substantiate compelling reasons for a supreme court to review its vision of the correct application of the Law, exposing the reasons for considering the previous one defective, to the extent that it leads tofundamental negative consequences.

Publisher

Universidad del Zulia

Subject

Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Agrawal, S. (2020). Scope and application of the doctrine of precedents under Article 141 of the Constitution of India. https://blog.ipleaders.in/scope-and-application-of-the-doctrine-of-precedents-under-article-141-of-the-constitution/.

2. Anonymous v. Khersonregiongaz Limited Liability Company no. 766/20797/18, October, 26, 2021. S. Ct. of Ukraine. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/101829988?fbclid=IwAR0rxYYtw6wnOQUHn0koKs-3eN-odXYhSiw0g-OUMgGUIrnpJZyf8rj_mT4.

3. Anonymous v. Office of the Security Service of Ukraine in Ternopil oblast, no. 500/2773/20, December, 23, 2021. S. Ct. of Ukraine. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/102171391.

4. Bakulina, S., Gudyma, D., Danishevskaya, V., Kibenko, O., Rogach, L., and Urkevich, V. (2018). Separate Opinion: Aiowa LLC v the State Registrar of the Talniv District Department of Justice of the Cherkasy Oblast, no. 823/378/16, June, 12, 2018. S. Ct. of Ukraine. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/76441988.

5. Bernazyuk, J. (2020). The juxtaposition of the need to ensure the uniformity of case law and department from the legal opinions of the Supreme Court of Ukraine (on the example of resolving public law disputes). https://sud.ua/ru/news/blog/177404-spivvidnoshennya- neobkhidnosti-zabezpechennya-yednosti-sudovoyi-praktiki-ta-vidstupu-vid-pravovikh-pozitsiy-verkhovnogo-sudu-na-prikladi-virishennya-publichno-pravovikh-sporiv (in Ukrainian).