Evaluating Existing Ocean Glider Sampling Strategies for Submesoscale Dynamics

Abstract

Abstract Mixing in the upper ocean is important for biological production and the transfer of heat and carbon between the atmosphere and deep ocean, properties commonly targeted by observational campaigns using ocean gliders. We assess the reliability of ocean gliders to obtain a robust statistical representation of submesoscale variability in the ocean mixed layer of the Weddell Sea. A 1/48° regional simulation of the Southern Ocean is sampled with virtual “bow-tie” glider deployments, which are then compared against the reference model output. Sampling biases of lateral buoyancy gradients associated with the arbitrary alignment between glider paths and fronts are formally quantified, and the magnitude of the biases is comparable to observational estimates, with a mean error of 52%. The sampling bias leaves errors in the retrieved distribution of buoyancy gradients largely insensitive to deployment length and the deployment of additional gliders. Notable sensitivity to these choices emerges when the biases are removed by sampling perpendicular to fronts at all times. Detecting seasonal change in the magnitude of buoyancy gradients is sensitive to the glider-orientation sampling bias but the change in variance is not. We evaluate the impact of reducing the number of dives and climbs in an observational campaign and find that small reductions in the number of dive–climb pairs have a limited effect on the results. Lastly, examining the sensitivity of the sampling bias to path orientation indicates that the bias is not dependent on the direction of travel in our deep ocean study site. Significance Statement Recent observational campaigns have focused on using autonomous vehicles to better understand processes responsible for mixing in the surface region of the ocean. There exists uncertainty around how effective these missions are at returning reliable and representative information. This study seeks to quantify the performance of existing strategies in observing mixing processes, and we confirm that strategies are biased to underestimate indicators of mixing. Furthermore, compensating for the bias by increasing the number of resources or changing the manner in which resources are used has limited reward. Our findings are important for decision-making during the planning phase of an observational campaign and display that further innovations are required to account for the sampling bias.