Comparative Performance of Radar, Laser, and Waverider Buoy Measurements of Ocean Waves. Part II: Time-Domain Analysis

Author:

Jangir Pramod Kumar1ORCID,Ewans Kevin C.12,Young Ian R.1

Affiliation:

1. a Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

2. b MetOcean Research Ltd., New Plymouth, New Zealand

Abstract

Abstract Accurate measurements of ocean waves underpin efficient offshore operations and optimal offshore structure design, helping to ensure the offshore industry can operate both safely and economically. Popular instruments used by the offshore industry are the Rosemount WaveRadar (Radar) and the Waverider Buoy. The Optech Laser has been used at some locations for specific studies. Recent reports indicate systematic differences of order 10% among the wave measurements made by these instruments. This paper examines the relative performance of these instruments based upon various time-domain comparisons, including results from a quality control (QC) procedure, capabilities of measuring the wave surface profile (skewness), and crest heights for varying wind sea and swell conditions. The QC check provides good-quality data that can be further investigated with an assurance of error-free data, suggesting that the Waverider produces the best-quality data with the lowest failure rate compared to the Laser and Radar. A significant number of the Waverider surface elevation records have negative skewness, particularly at higher sea states, affecting its crest height measurements, which are lower than those from the Laser and Radar. Additionally, the significant wave height (H1/3) estimates of the Radar are lower than the Laser and Waverider, but its zero-crossing wave periods (TZ), on average, are longer than the Laser and the Waverider. The significant heights (H1/3) of Laser and Waverider are in good agreement for all three datasets, but the Waverider’s zero-crossing wave period (TZ) estimates are significantly longer than the Laser.

Funder

Shell Global Solutions International

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science,Ocean Engineering

Reference50 articles.

1. The WADIC project: A comprehensive field evaluation of directional wave instrumentation;Allender, J.,1989

2. Babanin, A. V., G. G. Wake, and J. McConochie, 2016: Field observation site for air-sea interactions in tropical cyclones. ASME 2016 35th Int. Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Busan, South Korea, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 54570, https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2016-54570.

3. Large waves and drifting buoys in the Southern Ocean;Barbariol, F.,2019

4. Intercomparison of the performance of operational ocean wave forecasting systems with buoy data;Bidlot, J.-R.,2002

5. Buchner, B., G. Forristall, K. Ewans, M. Christou, and J. Hennig, 2011: New insights in extreme crest height distributions: A summary of the ‘CresT’ JIP. Int. Conf. on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Rotterdam, Netherlands, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 589–604, https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2011-49846.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3