Tropical and Subtropical Cloud Transitions in Weather and Climate Prediction Models: The GCSS/WGNE Pacific Cross-Section Intercomparison (GPCI)

Author:

Teixeira J.1,Cardoso S.23,Bonazzola M.4,Cole J.5,DelGenio A.6,DeMott C.7,Franklin C.8,Hannay C.3,Jakob C.9,Jiao Y.10,Karlsson J.11,Kitagawa H.12,Köhler M.13,Kuwano-Yoshida A.14,LeDrian C.15,Li J.1,Lock A.16,Miller M. J.13,Marquet P.17,Martins J.2,Mechoso C. R.18,Meijgaard E. v.19,Meinke I.20,Miranda P. M. A.2,Mironov D.21,Neggers R.19,Pan H. L.22,Randall D. A.7,Rasch P. J.23,Rockel B.24,Rossow W. B.25,Ritter B.21,Siebesma A. P.19,Soares P. M. M.2,Turk F. J.1,Vaillancourt P. A.26,Von Engeln A.27,Zhao M.28

Affiliation:

1. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

2. Instituto Dom Luis, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

3. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

4. Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Paris, France

5. Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

6. NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York

7. Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

8. Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

9. Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

10. Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

11. Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

12. Japan Meteorological Agency, Tokyo, Japan

13. European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, United Kingdom

14. Computational Earth Science Research Program, Earth Simulator Center, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan

15. Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zentrum, Zürich, Switzerland

16. United Kingdom Meteorological Office, Exeter, United Kingdom

17. Météo-France, Centre National de Recherches Meteorologiques, Toulouse, France

18. Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

19. Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut, De Bilt, The Netherlands

20. Experimental Climate Prediction Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

21. Research and Development Division, Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany

22. Environmental Modeling Center, National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Camp Springs, Maryland

23. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington

24. Institute for Coastal Research, GKSS Research Centre, Geesthacht, Germany

25. CREST, The City College of New York, New York, New York

26. Recherche en Prévision Numérique, Canadian Meteorological Centre, Environment Canada, Dorval, Quebec, Canada

27. EUMETSAT, Darmstadt, Germany

28. Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey

Abstract

Abstract A model evaluation approach is proposed in which weather and climate prediction models are analyzed along a Pacific Ocean cross section, from the stratocumulus regions off the coast of California, across the shallow convection dominated trade winds, to the deep convection regions of the ITCZ—the Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment Cloud System Study/Working Group on Numerical Experimentation (GCSS/WGNE) Pacific Cross-Section Intercomparison (GPCI). The main goal of GPCI is to evaluate and help understand and improve the representation of tropical and subtropical cloud processes in weather and climate prediction models. In this paper, a detailed analysis of cloud regime transitions along the cross section from the subtropics to the tropics for the season June–July–August of 1998 is presented. This GPCI study confirms many of the typical weather and climate prediction model problems in the representation of clouds: underestimation of clouds in the stratocumulus regime by most models with the corresponding consequences in terms of shortwave radiation biases; overestimation of clouds by the 40-yr ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-40) in the deep tropics (in particular) with the corresponding impact in the outgoing longwave radiation; large spread between the different models in terms of cloud cover, liquid water path and shortwave radiation; significant differences between the models in terms of vertical cross sections of cloud properties (in particular), vertical velocity, and relative humidity. An alternative analysis of cloud cover mean statistics is proposed where sharp gradients in cloud cover along the GPCI transect are taken into account. This analysis shows that the negative cloud bias of some models and ERA-40 in the stratocumulus regions [as compared to the first International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP)] is associated not only with lower values of cloud cover in these regimes, but also with a stratocumulus-to-cumulus transition that occurs too early along the trade wind Lagrangian trajectory. Histograms of cloud cover along the cross section differ significantly between models. Some models exhibit a quasi-bimodal structure with cloud cover being either very large (close to 100%) or very small, while other models show a more continuous transition. The ISCCP observations suggest that reality is in-between these two extreme examples. These different patterns reflect the diverse nature of the cloud, boundary layer, and convection parameterizations in the participating weather and climate prediction models.

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science

Cited by 132 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3