Determining Robust Impacts of Land-Use-Induced Land Cover Changes on Surface Climate over North America and Eurasia: Results from the First Set of LUCID Experiments

Author:

de Noblet-Ducoudré Nathalie1,Boisier Juan-Pablo1,Pitman Andy2,Bonan G. B.3,Brovkin V.4,Cruz Faye2,Delire C.5,Gayler V.4,van den Hurk B. J. J. M.6,Lawrence P. J.3,van der Molen M. K.6,Müller C.7,Reick C. H.4,Strengers B. J.8,Voldoire A.5

Affiliation:

1. * Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, Gif-sur-Yvette, France

2. Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

3. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

4. Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany

5. Groupe d’Étude de l’Atmosphère Météorologique, Toulouse, France

6. ** Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, Netherlands

7. Earth System Analysis, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany

8. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven, Netherlands

Abstract

The project Land-Use and Climate, Identification of Robust Impacts (LUCID) was conceived to address the robustness of biogeophysical impacts of historical land use–land cover change (LULCC). LUCID used seven atmosphere–land models with a common experimental design to explore those impacts of LULCC that are robust and consistent across the climate models. The biogeophysical impacts of LULCC were also compared to the impact of elevated greenhouse gases and resulting changes in sea surface temperatures and sea ice extent (CO2SST). Focusing the analysis on Eurasia and North America, this study shows that for a number of variables LULCC has an impact of similar magnitude but of an opposite sign, to increased greenhouse gases and warmer oceans. However, the variability among the individual models’ response to LULCC is larger than that found from the increase in CO2SST. The results of the study show that although the dispersion among the models’ response to LULCC is large, there are a number of robust common features shared by all models: the amount of available energy used for turbulent fluxes is consistent between the models and the changes in response to LULCC depend almost linearly on the amount of trees removed. However, less encouraging is the conclusion that there is no consistency among the various models regarding how LULCC affects the partitioning of available energy between latent and sensible heat fluxes at a specific time. The results therefore highlight the urgent need to evaluate land surface models more thoroughly, particularly how they respond to a perturbation in addition to how they simulate an observed average state.

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3