A Review of Uncertainties in Global Temperature Projections over the Twenty-First Century

Author:

Knutti R.12,Allen M. R.3,Friedlingstein P.4,Gregory J. M.56,Hegerl G. C.7,Meehl G. A.2,Meinshausen M.8,Murphy J. M.6,Plattner G.-K.910,Raper S. C. B.11,Stocker T. F.9,Stott P. A.6,Teng H.2,Wigley T. M. L.2

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, Zurich, Switzerland

2. National Center for Atmospheric Research,1 Boulder, Colorado

3. Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

4. IPSL/LSCE, Gif-sur-Yvette, France

5. Walker Institute, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom

6. Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, United Kingdom

7. School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland

8. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany

9. Climate and Environmental Physics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

10. Environmental Physics, Institute for Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

11. CATE, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract Quantification of the uncertainties in future climate projections is crucial for the implementation of climate policies. Here a review of projections of global temperature change over the twenty-first century is provided for the six illustrative emission scenarios from the Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) that assume no policy intervention, based on the latest generation of coupled general circulation models, climate models of intermediate complexity, and simple models, and uncertainty ranges and probabilistic projections from various published methods and models are assessed. Despite substantial improvements in climate models, projections for given scenarios on average have not changed much in recent years. Recent progress has, however, increased the confidence in uncertainty estimates and now allows a better separation of the uncertainties introduced by scenarios, physical feedbacks, carbon cycle, and structural uncertainty. Projection uncertainties are now constrained by observations and therefore consistent with past observed trends and patterns. Future trends in global temperature resulting from anthropogenic forcing over the next few decades are found to be comparably well constrained. Uncertainties for projections on the century time scale, when accounting for structural and feedback uncertainties, are larger than captured in single models or methods. This is due to differences in the models, the sources of uncertainty taken into account, the type of observational constraints used, and the statistical assumptions made. It is shown that as an approximation, the relative uncertainty range for projected warming in 2100 is the same for all scenarios. Inclusion of uncertainties in carbon cycle–climate feedbacks extends the upper bound of the uncertainty range by more than the lower bound.

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science

Reference47 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3