Accuracy of Atlantic and Eastern North Pacific Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecast Guidance

Author:

Elsberry Russell L.1,Lambert Tara D. B.1,Boothe Mark A.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Meteorology, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California

Abstract

Abstract Five statistical and dynamical tropical cyclone intensity guidance techniques available at the National Hurricane Center (NHC) during the 2003 and 2004 Atlantic and eastern North Pacific seasons were evaluated within three intensity phases: (I) formation; (II) early intensification, with a subcategory (IIa) of a decay and reintensification cycle; and (III) decay. In phase I in the Atlantic, the various techniques tended to predict that a tropical storm would form from six tropical depressions that did not develop further, and thus the tendency was for false alarms in these cases. For the other 24 depressions that did become tropical storms, the statistical–dynamical techniques, statistical hurricane prediction scheme (SHIPS) and decay SHIPS (DSHIPS), have some skill relative to the 5-day statistical hurricane intensity forecast climatology and persistence technique, but they also tend to intensify all depressions and thus are prone to false alarms. In phase II, the statistical–dynamical models SHIPS and DSHIPS do not predict the rapid intensification cases (≥30 kt in 24 h) 48 h in advance. Although the dynamical Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Interpolated model does predict rapid intensification, many of these cases are at the incorrect times with many false alarms. The best performances in forecasting at least 24 h in advance the 21 decay and reintensification cycles in the Atlantic were the three forecasts by the dynamical Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Model-Navy (interpolated) model. Whereas DSHIPS was the best technique in the Atlantic during the decay phase III, none of the techniques excelled in the eastern North Pacific. All techniques tend to decay the tropical cyclones in both basins too slowly, except that DSHIPS performed well (12 of 18) during rapid decay events in the Atlantic. This evaluation indicates where NHC forecasters have deficient guidance and thus where research is necessary for improving intensity forecasts.

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science

Reference18 articles.

1. The ensemble of tropical cyclone track forecasting models in the North Atlantic basin.;Aberson;Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,2001

2. Bender, M. A., I.Ginis, T. P.Marchok, H. L.Pan, B.Thomas, and R. E.Tuleya, cited. 2005: A summary of upgrades to the operational GFDL hurricane model for 2003. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/75131.pdf.].

3. Blackerby, J. S. , 2005: The accuracy of western North Pacific tropical cyclone intensity guidance. M.S. thesis, Dept. of Meteorology, Naval Postgraduate School, 127 pp. [Available at online http://theses.nps.navy.mil/05Mar_Blackerby.pdf.].

4. Beta test of the Systematic Approach expert system prototype as a tropical cyclone track forecasting aid.;Carr;Wea. Forecasting,2001

5. DeMaria, M., R. M.Zehr, J. P.Kossin, and J. A.Knaff, 2002: The use of GOES imagery in statistical hurricane intensity prediction. Preprints, 25th Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, San Diego, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 120–121.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3