Abstract
AbstractThis paper discusses the derivation of the refractive index structure function. It shows that the traditional formulation, which is based on the hydrostatic assumption, leads to increasing errors with height when compared with a formulation that is based on the potential temperature. The paper corrects a long-standing problem of extrapolating the traditional boundary layer approximation beyond its region of validity (i.e., to the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere). The new derivation may have applications in observational work to measure and seeing and in numerical modeling efforts. A preliminary analysis of the influence of the new formulation in numerical modeling of seeing suggests that impact on seeing will be small in general, because the largest contribution to seeing generally comes from the lower troposphere. However, an accurate profile is needed because other astroclimatic parameters, such as the isoplanatic angle, can suffer from the lack of accuracy at high altitude. This work may also have application in radar meteorology, since clear-air radar sensitivity depends on accurate estimation of .
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Reference23 articles.
1. Starcasting;Businger;Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,2002
2. Modeling turbulence and seeing over Mauna Kea;Cherubini;J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol.,2008
3. Multiwavelength backscatter from the clear atmosphere;Hardy;J. Geophys. Res.,1966
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献