How Post-Immunization COVID-19 Context Affected Residents’ Evacuation Behavior during Hurricane Ida

Author:

Polen Amy1ORCID,Collins Jennifer2,Dunn Elizabeth1,Murphy Stephen3,Jernigan Isabelle4,McSweeney Killian5,Zhu Yi-Jie2

Affiliation:

1. a College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida

2. b School of Geosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida

3. c School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana

4. d Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

5. e Department of Geography, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia

Abstract

Abstract Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, decision-making during disasters fundamentally changed to accommodate the combined risks of hurricanes and infectious diseases. Prior research conducted in 2020 by Collins et al. examined how individuals changed their intended evacuation decision-making during the pandemic or their actual evacuation decisions during Hurricanes Laura and Sally. Hurricane Ida provided further data on evacuation decision-making when vaccinations and masks were widely available. A digital survey was disseminated to individuals affected by Hurricane Ida in 2021. Respondents provided information about their actual evacuation choices and perceptions of public shelters and COVID-19 risks. In comparison with the 2020 hurricane season, more individuals have reduced negative perceptions of hurricane shelters. However, individuals were less likely to utilize public shelters than in the 2020 season, with 11.4% more individuals stating they would definitely or probably avoid using shelters in 2021. Fewer individuals identified that COVID-19 was a primary reason they chose to stay home during Hurricane Ida (19.5% as compared with 86.8% during Hurricanes Laura and Sally). Furthermore, respondents with health risks for severe COVID-19 symptoms were no more likely to evacuate than those respondents who had no health risks. Potentially, as the pandemic progressed and vaccine availability and COVID-19 management improved, COVID-19 has had less impact on evacuation decision-making. The results from this work should guide planners in emergency management and public health in future hurricane seasons and future pandemics or other outbreaks to anticipate behavior changes and properly manage infectious disease threats.

Funder

Natural Hazards Center, University of Colorado Boulder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Global and Planetary Change

Reference53 articles.

1. Hurricane evacuation behavior;Baker, E. J.,1991

2. Delayed-impact infectious disease after a natural disaster;Bissell, R. A.,1983

3. Borenstein, S., 2021: Ida: Exclamation point on record onslaught of US landfalls. AP News, https://apnews.com/article/environment-and-nature-science--85bbaba49c4b8374a29ecfc1cfb5cbbd#:∼:text=Ida%20was%20listed%20at%2085,in%20the%20day%20before%20landfall.

4. Individual hurricane evacuation intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights for risk communication and emergency management policies;Botzen, W. J. W.,2022

5. Collins, J., A. Polen, E. Dunn, L. Maas, E. Ackerson, J. Valmond, E. Morales, and D. Colón-Burgos, 2021a: Compound hazards, evacuations, and shelter choices: Implications for public health practices in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Natural Hazards Center Public Health Rep. Series 6, https://hazards.colorado.edu/public-health-disaster-research/compound-hazards-evacuations-and-shelter-choices.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3