Biases of the Barotropic Atmospheric Circulation Variability in CMIP6 Models

Abstract

Abstract Two ensembles of Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP) simulations, in the scope of the current Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6), are compared with their fully coupled counterparts. The atmospheric models simulate less barotropic atmospheric circulation variability over the North Atlantic and more barotropic atmospheric circulation variability over the North Pacific when compared with reanalysis variability, at intraseasonal and interannual scales. The coupled climate simulations have smaller global barotropic variability than the corresponding AMIP simulations. The smaller variability of the coupled simulations results in no mean overestimation of the subtropical jet variability in the North Pacific, but further underestimation of the jet stream variability in the North Atlantic. The results suggest that the reduction of the biases, in the North Pacific barotropic atmospheric variability, of coupled climate simulations is achieved through compensating biases in the mean sea surface temperatures (SSTs). Moreover, the reduction of the positive biases in the North Pacific seems to be associated with a reduction of the excitation of the most unstable barotropic mode of the atmospheric circulation, which contributes also to a reduction of the barotropic atmospheric variability in the North Atlantic.