Confidence and Uncertainty in Simulating Tropical Cyclone Long-Term Variability Using the CMIP6-HighResMIP

Author:

Song Kexin1,Zhao Jiuwei12,Zhan Ruifen34,Tao Li1,Chen Lin1

Affiliation:

1. a Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD)/Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change (ILCEC), Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education (KLME), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China

2. b Institute of Climate and Application Research, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China

3. c Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences and Institute of Atmospheric Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

4. d Big Data Institute for Carbon Emission and Environmental Pollution, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Abstract

Abstract Confidence and uncertainty issues of simulations were seldom evaluated in previous studies although the climate models are widely used. This study evaluates the performance of the CMIP6-HighResMIP simulations in presenting long-term variability of tropical cyclone (TC) genesis frequency (TCGF) and track density (TCTD) and quantifies the relative contributions of internal and external forcing to TC activities during the 1950–2014. There is overall poor model performance in simulating long-term changes in TC activities over the Northern Hemisphere, including interdecadal variabilities and long-term linear trends. The simulated long-term changes in TCGF and TCTD over the eastern North Pacific (ENP) in six high-resolution models show opposite characteristics to the observations. Moreover, most models cannot capture the variabilities of TCGF and TCTD over the western part of the western North Pacific (WNP) and northern part of the North Atlantic (NA). However, these models show a high degree of confidence in reproducing the interdecadal variabilities and linear trends of TCGF and TCTD over the eastern part of the WNP and the tropical NA. Quantitative evaluations further show that there are the opposite relative contributions of long-term climate variabilities to TCGF and TCTD changes over the ENP between the observations and the multimodel ensemble mean, followed by large model biases over the western WNP and the northern NA, but relatively consistent contributions over the southern NA and the Caribbean. These results help us cope with contrasting and consistent future TC changes among the model projections. Significance Statement While climate models have been widely used to project future changes in tropical cyclone (TC) activity, few studies have examined to what extent we can trust these model projections. We used the CMIP6-HighResMIP simulations to quantify the model biases in presenting TC activity, and evaluate the relative contributions of internal and external forcing to TC activities. In general, the HighResMIP has large discrepancies in representing longer-term climate variability of TC activity. However, the models can capture well TC activity over the eastern part of the western North Pacific and tropical Atlantic, which is attributed to good performance of models in reproducing the relationship between long-term climate variabilities beyond interannual scale and TC activity. These results highlight confidence and uncertainty in future TC changes among the model projections.

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science

Reference94 articles.

1. MJO propagation across the Maritime Continent: Are CMIP6 models better than CMIP5 models?;Ahn, M. S.,2020

2. Tropical cyclone footprints in long-term mean state and multiscale climate variability in the western North Pacific as seen in the JRA-55 reanalysis;Arakane, S.,2021

3. Western North Pacific tropical cyclone intensity and ENSO;Camargo, S. J.,2005

4. Use of a genesis potential index to diagnose ENSO effects on tropical cyclone genesis;Camargo, S. J.,2007

5. On the weakened relationship between spring Arctic Oscillation and following summer tropical cyclone frequency over the western North Pacific: A comparison between 1968–1986 and 1989–2007;Cao, X.,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3