A New Look at Stratospheric Sudden Warmings. Part II: Evaluation of Numerical Model Simulations

Author:

Charlton Andrew J.1,Polvani Lorenzo M.2,Perlwitz Judith3,Sassi Fabrizio4,Manzini Elisa5,Shibata Kiyotaka6,Pawson Steven7,Nielsen J. Eric7,Rind David8

Affiliation:

1. *Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, New York

2. Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, and Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York

3. Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Climate Diagnostics Center, University of Colorado, and Physical Sciences Division, NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

4. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

5. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Bologna, Italy

6. Meteorological Research Institute, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

7. Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, Maryland

8. NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York

Abstract

Abstract The simulation of major midwinter stratospheric sudden warmings (SSWs) in six stratosphere-resolving general circulation models (GCMs) is examined. The GCMs are compared to a new climatology of SSWs, based on the dynamical characteristics of the events. First, the number, type, and temporal distribution of SSW events are evaluated. Most of the models show a lower frequency of SSW events than the climatology, which has a mean frequency of 6.0 SSWs per decade. Statistical tests show that three of the six models produce significantly fewer SSWs than the climatology, between 1.0 and 2.6 SSWs per decade. Second, four process-based diagnostics are calculated for all of the SSW events in each model. It is found that SSWs in the GCMs compare favorably with dynamical benchmarks for SSW established in the first part of the study. These results indicate that GCMs are capable of quite accurately simulating the dynamics required to produce SSWs, but with lower frequency than the climatology. Further dynamical diagnostics hint that, in at least one case, this is due to a lack of meridional heat flux in the lower stratosphere. Even though the SSWs simulated by most GCMs are dynamically realistic when compared to the NCEP–NCAR reanalysis, the reasons for the relative paucity of SSWs in GCMs remains an important and open question.

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science

Reference43 articles.

1. Middle Atmosphere Dynamics.;Andrews,1985

2. Uncertainties and assesments of chemistry-climate models of the stratosphere.;Austin;Atmos. Chem. Phys.,2003

3. Bloom, S. , and Coauthors, 2005: Documentation and validation of the Goddard Earth Observing Ststem (GEOS) Data Assimilation System—Version 4. Technical Report Series on Global Modelling and Data Assimilation, Tech. Rep. 26, 187 pp.

4. The response of the stratospheric climate to projected changes in the concentrations of well-mixed greenhouse gases from 1992 to 2051.;Butchart;J. Climate,2000

5. A new look at stratospheric sudden warmings. Part I: Climatology and modeling benchmarks.;Charlton;J. Climate,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3