Processing of Ice Cloud In Situ Data Collected by Bulk Water, Scattering, and Imaging Probes: Fundamentals, Uncertainties, and Efforts toward Consistency

Author:

McFarquhar Greg M.12,Baumgardner Darrel3,Bansemer Aaron2,Abel Steven J.4,Crosier Jonathan5,French Jeff6,Rosenberg Phil7,Korolev Alexei8,Schwarzoenboeck Alfons9,Leroy Delphine9,Um Junshik1,Wu Wei12,Heymsfield Andrew J.2,Twohy Cynthia10,Detwiler Andrew11,Field Paul47,Neumann Andrea12,Cotton Richard4,Axisa Duncan2,Dong Jiayin1

Affiliation:

1. University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois

2. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

3. Droplet Measurement Technologies, Boulder, Colorado

4. Met Office, Exeter, United Kingdom

5. University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

6. University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming

7. University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

8. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Downsview, Ontario, Canada

9. Laboratoire de Météorologie Physique, CNRS/Université Blaise Pascal, Aubière, France

10. NorthWest Research Associates, Redmond, Washington

11. South Dakota Schools of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, South Dakota

12. University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota

Abstract

Abstract In situ observations of cloud properties made by airborne probes play a critical role in ice cloud research through their role in process studies, parameterization development, and evaluation of simulations and remote sensing retrievals. To determine how cloud properties vary with environmental conditions, in situ data collected during different field projects processed by different groups must be used. However, because of the diverse algorithms and codes that are used to process measurements, it can be challenging to compare the results. Therefore it is vital to understand both the limitations of specific probes and uncertainties introduced by processing algorithms. Since there is currently no universally accepted framework regarding how in situ measurements should be processed, there is a need for a general reference that describes the most commonly applied algorithms along with their strengths and weaknesses. Methods used to process data from bulk water probes, single-particle light-scattering spectrometers and cloud-imaging probes are reviewed herein, with emphasis on measurements of the ice phase. Particular attention is paid to how uncertainties, caveats, and assumptions in processing algorithms affect derived products since there is currently no consensus on the optimal way of analyzing data. Recommendations for improving the analysis and interpretation of in situ data include the following: establishment of a common reference library of individual processing algorithms, better documentation of assumptions used in these algorithms, development and maintenance of sustainable community software for processing in situ observations, and more studies that compare different algorithms with the same benchmark datasets.

Funder

Office of Science

National Science Foundation

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science,Oceanography

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3