Steering Flow Sensitivity in Forecast Models for Hurricane Ian (2022)

Author:

Colby Frank P.1,Barlow Mathew1,Penny Andrew B.23

Affiliation:

1. a University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts

2. b University Corporation for Atmospheric Research/Cooperative Programs for the Advancement of Earth System Science, Boulder, Colorado

3. c National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida

Abstract

Abstract Hurricane Ian made landfall along Florida’s west coast at 1905 UTC 28 September 2022 near the Fort Myers area as a high-impact storm. Here, we examine the potential link between track forecast errors near the time of landfall and errors in both the synoptic-scale upper-level flow and a shortwave moving within that flow. Five days before the actual landfall (0000 UTC 23 September), most model guidance indicated landfall would occur close to where Ian eventually came ashore. But by 0000 UTC 25 September, model forecasts were all forecasting landfall in the Florida Panhandle. One day later, the models again agreed with each other but for a landfall 100–200 km north of Tampa, Florida. By 0000 UTC 27 September, forecast models indicated landfall would occur near Tampa. Model forecasts continued shifting to the right and finally converged on Punta Gorda, Florida, as the landfall location, less than 24 h before landfall. In this short article, we hypothesize that the track of Ian depended on subtle interactions with an extratropical wave in the middle and upper atmosphere. Deterministic and ensemble model forecasts reveal that the interactions were very sensitive to the characteristics of this wave and the synoptic-scale flow in which the wave was embedded. A 1–2-dam difference in the geopotential heights played a major role in whether Ian moved north into the Panhandle or toward the east, making landfall in central Florida. Significance Statement The purpose of this work is to look at possible causes of error in forecasts of Hurricane Ian’s landfall with the intent of saving lives and reducing damage, which can run to the billions of dollars. The path that hurricanes take is strongly influenced by the larger-scale weather patterns around them. We find that small errors in the upper-level flow patterns north of the hurricane appear to have played an important role in the forecast. These errors were present in both the general flow and a wave moving through that flow, resulting in small but significant changes to the forecast path. Understanding the cause of forecast errors is a key step both in improving forecasts and in identifying types of events that are more difficult to forecast.

Funder

NOAA MAPP

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Reference18 articles.

1. The THORPEX Interactive Grand Global Ensemble;Bougeault, P.,2010

2. An examination of model track forecast errors for Hurricane Ike (2008) in the Gulf of Mexico;Brennan, M. J.,2011

3. Bucci, L., L. Alaka, A. Hagen, S. Delgado, and J. Beven, 2023: Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Ian (23–30 September). NHC Tech. Rep. AL092022, 72 pp., https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL092022_Ian.pdf.

4. Dynamical tropical cyclone track forecast errors. Part II: Midlatitude circulation influences;Carr, L. E., III,2000

5. Global ensemble forecast tracks for Tropical Storm Debby;Colby, F. P., Jr.,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3