Assessing NOAA Rip-Current Hazard Likelihood Predictions: Comparison with Lifeguard Observations and Parameterizations of Bathymetric and Transient Rip-Current Types

Author:

Casper Audrey1ORCID,Nuss Emma S.2,Baker Christine M.23,Moulton Melissa245,Dusek Gregory6

Affiliation:

1. a George Washington University, Washington, D.C.

2. b Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

3. c Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina

4. e Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

5. f Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

6. d Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services, NOAA/National Ocean Service, Silver Spring, Maryland

Abstract

Abstract Rip currents, fast offshore-directed flows, are the leading cause of death and rescues on surf beaches worldwide. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) seeks to minimize this threat by providing rip-current hazard likelihood forecasts based on environmental conditions from the Nearshore Wave Prediction System. Rip currents come in several types, including bathymetric rip currents that form when waves break on sandbars interspersed with channels and transient rip currents that form when there are breaking waves coming from multiple directions. The NOAA model was developed and tested in an area where bathymetric rip currents may be the most prevalent type of rip current. Therefore, model performance in regions where other types of rip currents (e.g., transient rip currents) may be more ubiquitous remains unknown. To investigate the efficacy of the NOAA model guidance in the context of different rip-current types, we compared modeled rip-current probabilities with physical-based parameterizations of bathymetric and transient rip-current speeds. We also compared these probabilities to lifeguard observations of bathymetric and transient rip currents from Salt Creek Beach, California, in summer and fall 2021. We found that the NOAA model skillfully predicts a wide range of hazardous parameterized bathymetric speeds but generally underpredicts hazardous transient rip-current speeds and the hazardous rip currents observed at Salt Creek Beach. Our results demonstrate how wave parameters, including directional spread, may serve as environmental indicators of rip-current hazard. By evaluating factors that influence the skill of modeled rip-current predictions, we strive toward improved rip-current hazard forecasting. Significance Statement The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well the NOAA rip-current hazard model predicts different rip-current types. Accurate forecasting of rip currents is important because rip currents are the leading cause of death and rescues at surf beaches worldwide. By comparing the performance of the NOAA model to parameterized rip-current speed and lifeguard observations of rip-current strength, we highlighted the model’s decreased ability to predict hazardous transient rip currents compared to hazardous bathymetric rip currents. Because bathymetric and transient rip currents are driven by different environmental conditions, an improved hazard model must be sensitive to these different conditions to predict a greater range of hazardous rip currents.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Office of Naval Research

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Reference58 articles.

1. Rip current-related fatalities in India: A new predictive risk scale for forecasting rip currents;Arun Kumar, S. V. V.,2014

2. Booij, N., L. H. Holthuijsen, and R. C. Ris, 1996: The “swan” wave model for shallow water. Coastal Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, 668–676.

3. Brander, R., and T. Scott, 2018: Science of the rip current hazard. The Science of Beach Lifeguarding, CRC Press, 67–85.

4. Estimations of rip current rescues and drowning in the United States;Brewster, B. C.,2019

5. Rip current related drowning deaths and rescues in Australia 2004–2011;Brighton, B.,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3