Affiliation:
1. Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland
2. Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, and Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland
Abstract
Abstract
Interannual variability of Great Plains precipitation in the warm season months is analyzed using gridded observations, satellite-based precipitation estimates, NCEP reanalysis data and the 40-yr European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis (ERA-40) data, and the half-century-long NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3.0, version 3.0) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Seasonal-to-Intraseasonal Prediction Project (NSIPP) atmospheric model simulations. Regional hydroclimate is the focus because of its immense societal impact and because the involved variability mechanisms are not well understood.
The Great Plains precipitation variability is represented rather differently, and only quasi realistically, in the reanalyses. NCEP has larger amplitude but less traction with observations in comparison with ERA-40. Model simulations exhibit more realistic amplitudes, which are between those of NCEP and ERA-40. The simulated variability is however uncorrelated with observations in both models, with monthly correlations smaller than 0.10 in all cases. An assessment of the regional atmosphere water balance is revealing: Stationary moisture flux convergence accounts for most of the Great Plains variability in ERA-40, but not in the NCEP reanalysis and model simulations; convergent fluxes generate less than half of the precipitation in the latter, while local evaporation does the rest in models.
Phenomenal evaporation in the models—up to 4 times larger than the highest observationally constrained estimate (NCEP’s)—provides the bulk of the moisture for Great Plains precipitation variability; thus, precipitation recycling is very efficient in both models, perhaps too efficient.
Remote water sources contribute substantially to Great Plains hydroclimate variability in nature via fluxes. Getting the interaction pathways right is presently challenging for the models.
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Reference44 articles.
1. Amador, J.
, and Coauthors, cited. 2004: North American Monsoon Experiment (NAME): Science and implementation plan. NAME Project Science Team. [Available online at http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/monsoon/.].
2. Evolution of the North American monsoon system.;Barlow;J. Climate,1998
3. ENSO, Pacific decadal variability, and U.S. summertime precipitation, drought, and streamflow.;Barlow;J. Climate,2001
4. Atmospheric circulation associated with the Midwest floods of 1993.;Bell;Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,1995
5. Global precipitation and thunderstorm frequencies. Part I: Seasonal and interannual variations.;Dai;J. Climate,2001
Cited by
117 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献