Evaluating Knowledge to Support Climate Action: A Framework for Sustained Assessment. Report of an Independent Advisory Committee on Applied Climate Assessment

Author:

Moss R. H.1,Avery S.2,Baja K.3,Burkett M.4,Chischilly A. M.5,Dell J.6,Fleming P. A.7,Geil K.8,Jacobs K.9,Jones A.10,Knowlton K.11,Koh J.12,Lemos M. C.13,Melillo J.14,Pandya R.15,Richmond T. C.16,Scarlett L.17,Snyder J.18,Stults M.19,Waple A. M.20,Whitehead J.21,Zarrilli D.22,Ayyub B. M.23,Fox J.24,Ganguly A.25,Joppa L.7,Julius S.26,Kirshen P.27,Kreutter R.28,McGovern A.29,Meyer R.30,Neumann J.31,Solecki W.32,Smith J.33,Tissot P.34,Yohe G.35,Zimmerman R.36

Affiliation:

1. The Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York

2. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute (emerita), Woods Hole, Massachusetts

3. Urban Sustainability Directors Network, Baltimore, Maryland

4. William S. Richardson School of Law, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Honolulu., Hawaii

5. Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona

6. Resiliency Resources LLC, Houston, Texas

7. Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington

8. AAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellow at USDA, Beltsville, Maryland

9. Center for Climate Adaptation Science and Solutions, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

10. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California

11. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York

12. The Lightsmith Group, New York, New York

13. School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

14. The Ecosystems Center, Woods Hole, Massachusetts

15. Thriving Earth Exchange, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.

16. Van Ness Feldman, Seattle, Washington

17. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia

18. Office of Air Resources, Climate Change and Energy, New York Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, New York

19. City of Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan

20. Studio30k, Asheville, North Carolina

21. North Carolina Sea Grant, Raleigh, North Carolina

22. New York City Mayor’s Office, New York, New York

23. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland

24. National Environmental Modeling and Analysis Center, Asheville, North Carolina

25. Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts

26. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

27. University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts

28. Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey

29. University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

30. University of California, Davis, Davis, California

31. Industrial Economics, Cambridge, Massachusetts

32. Hunter College of City University of New York, New York, New York

33. Abt Associates, Boulder, Colorado

34. Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

35. Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut

36. New York University, New York, New York

Abstract

Abstract As states, cities, tribes, and private interests cope with climate damages and seek to increase preparedness and resilience, they will need to navigate myriad choices and options available to them. Making these choices in ways that identify pathways for climate action that support their development objectives will require constructive public dialogue, community participation, and flexible and ongoing access to science- and experience-based knowledge. In 2016, a Federal Advisory Committee (FAC) was convened to recommend how to conduct a sustained National Climate Assessment (NCA) to increase the relevance and usability of assessments for informing action. The FAC was disbanded in 2017, but members and additional experts reconvened to complete the report that is presented here. A key recommendation is establishing a new nonfederal “climate assessment consortium” to increase the role of state/local/tribal government and civil society in assessments. The expanded process would 1) focus on applied problems faced by practitioners, 2) organize sustained partnerships for collaborative learning across similar projects and case studies to identify effective tested practices, and 3) assess and improve knowledge-based methods for project implementation. Specific recommendations include evaluating climate models and data using user-defined metrics; improving benefit–cost assessment and supporting decision-making under uncertainty; and accelerating application of tools and methods such as citizen science, artificial intelligence, indicators, and geospatial analysis. The recommendations are the result of broad consultation and present an ambitious agenda for federal agencies, state/local/tribal jurisdictions, universities and the research sector, professional associations, nongovernmental and community-based organizations, and private-sector firms.

Funder

New York State Energy Research and Development Authority

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

Atmospheric Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Global and Planetary Change

Cited by 43 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3