Validation of MODIS Active Fire Detection Products Derived from Two Algorithms

Author:

Morisette Jeffrey T.1,Giglio Louis2,Csiszar Ivan2,Setzer Alberto3,Schroeder Wilfrid4,Morton Douglas4,Justice Christopher O.4

Affiliation:

1. Terrestrial Information Systems Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

2. Department of Geography, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland

3. Centro de Previsão do Tempo e Estudos Climáticos, INPE, Sao Jose dos Campos, Sao Paolo, Brazil

4. Department of Geography, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland

Abstract

Abstract Fire influences global change and tropical ecosystems through its connection to land-cover dynamics, atmospheric composition, and the global carbon cycle. As such, the climate change community, the Brazilian government, and the Large-Scale Biosphere–Atmosphere (LBA) Experiment in Amazonia are interested in the use of satellites to monitor and quantify fire occurrence throughout Brazil. Because multiple satellites and algorithms are being utilized, it is important to quantify the accuracy of the derived products. In this paper the characteristics of two fire detection algorithms are evaluated, both of which are applied to Terra’s Moderate Resolution Imagine Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data and with both operationally producing publicly available fire locations. The two algorithms are NASA’s operational Earth Observing System (EOS) MODIS fire detection product and Brazil’s Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE) algorithm. Both algorithms are compared to fire maps that are derived independently from 30-m spatial resolution Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) imagery. A quantitative comparison is accomplished through logistic regression and error matrices. Results show that the likelihood of MODIS fire detection, for either algorithm, is a function of both the number of ASTER fire pixels within the MODIS pixel as well as the contiguity of those pixels. Both algorithms have similar omission errors and each has a fairly high likelihood of detecting relatively small fires, as observed in the ASTER data. However, INPE’s commission error is roughly 3 times more than that of the EOS algorithm.

Publisher

American Meteorological Society

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Reference32 articles.

1. Categorical Data Analysis.;Agresti,1990

2. Biomass burning emissions and associated haze layers over Amazonia.;Andreae;J. Geophys. Res.,1988

3. Classfication accuracy: A user approach.;Aronoff;Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens.,1982

4. The map accuracy report: A user’s view.;Aronoff;Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens.,1982

5. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices.;Congalton,1999

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3