Hazardous Weather Prediction and Communication in the Modern Information Environment
Author:
Morss Rebecca E.1, Demuth Julie L.1, Lazrus Heather1, Palen Leysia2, Barton C. Michael3, Davis Christopher A.1, Snyder Chris1, Wilhelmi Olga V.1, Anderson Kenneth M.2, Ahijevych David A.1, Anderson Jennings2, Bica Melissa2, Fossell Kathryn R.1, Henderson Jennifer4, Kogan Marina2, Stowe Kevin2, Watts Joshua3
Affiliation:
1. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado 2. University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 3. Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 4. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia
Abstract
Abstract
During the last few decades, scientific capabilities for understanding and predicting weather and climate risks have advanced rapidly. At the same time, technological advances, such as the Internet, mobile devices, and social media, are transforming how people exchange and interact with information. In this modern information environment, risk communication, interpretation, and decision-making are rapidly evolving processes that intersect across space, time, and society. Instead of a linear or iterative process in which individual members of the public assess and respond to distinct pieces of weather forecast or warning information, this article conceives of weather prediction, communication, and decision-making as an interconnected dynamic system. In this expanded framework, information and uncertainty evolve in conjunction with people’s risk perceptions, vulnerabilities, and decisions as a hazardous weather threat approaches; these processes are intertwined with evolving social interactions in the physical and digital worlds. Along with the framework, the article presents two interdisciplinary research approaches for advancing the understanding of this complex system and the processes within it: analysis of social media streams and computational natural–human system modeling. Examples from ongoing research are used to demonstrate these approaches and illustrate the types of new insights they can reveal. This expanded perspective together with research approaches, such as those introduced, can help researchers and practitioners understand and improve the creation and communication of information in atmospheric science and other fields.
Publisher
American Meteorological Society
Subject
Atmospheric Science
Reference102 articles.
1. Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters;Adger;Science,2005 2. Anderson, J., and Coauthors, 2016: Far far away in Far Rockaway: Responses to risks and impacts during Hurricane Sandy through first-person social media narratives. Proc. 13th Int. Conf. on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, International Association for Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, 16 pp., http://idl.iscram.org/files/jenningsanderson/2016/1388_JenningsAnderson_etal2016.pdf. 3. Making computational social science effective: Epistemology, methodology, and technology;Bankes;Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev.,2002 4. Complexity, social complexity, and modeling;Barton;J. Archaeol. Method Theory,2014 5. Experimental socioecology: Integrative science for Anthropocene landscape dynamics;Barton;Anthropocene,2016
Cited by
59 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|