Affiliation:
1. Royal Holloway, University of London
Abstract
This article analyses the current state of our discipline, particularly its decoloniality and inclusivity. This is investigated via two lenses: data from Roman Archaeology Conferences and Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conferences from 1991 to 2019; and data from the 2019 Roman Archaeology Teaching Survey. These two lenses provide ways into thinking about whose voices are heard in the discipline, current barriers to more diverse voices, and biases within the topics and regions of the Roman world in our research and teaching. The article argues that these data demonstrate a need for change within our discipline, across research and teaching, in order to promote a healthier, decolonial, and more inclusive discipline for the future. As a consequence, this article also makes numerous recommendations and suggestions for action to bring about positive change.
Publisher
Open Library of the Humanities
Reference52 articles.
1. Toward a connected Classics profession;Allen, Danielle;American Journal of Philology,2020
2. The contradiction of the myth of individual merit, and the reality of a patriarchal support system in academic careers: a feminist investigation;Bagilhole, BarbaraGoode, Jackie;European Journal of Women’s Studies,2001
3. Behari-Leak, Kasturi, Masehela, Langutani, Marhaya, Luyanda, Tjabane, Masebala and Merckel, Ness 2017. Decolonising the curriculum: it’s in the detail, not just in the definition. The Conversation. Available at https://theconversation.com/decolonising-the-curriculum-its-in-the-detail-not-just-in-the-definition-73772 [Last accessed 26.06.2019].
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献