Affiliation:
1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Abstract
This paper describes and offers an analysis of a kind of relative clause acceptable to some English speakers that we call a wh-which relative, e.g. the snowmen whom (of) which the children loved. We propose that these relatives involve the movement of a phrase headed by an element that we call R, analogous to the Q posited by Cable (2010a, 2010b) for interrogatives — the optional of in the example above being an overt form of a special variant of R. The syntax of this variant resembles particularly closely the variant of Q proposed by Coon (2009) for Ch’ol interrogatives in triggering movement to its specifier — but with a puzzle that has a parallel in Finnish, for which we propose a tentative solution. The analysis thus supports the overall explanatory landscape for pied-piping phenomena proposed by Cable, but presents a challenge to his broader claim that all pied-piping phenomena can be explained in this way. If correct, it provides yet one more instance of the "unity in diversity" of syntactic structures across the world’s languages.
Publisher
Open Library of the Humanities
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference43 articles.
1. Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/AAI3104085/.
2. Pied-piping, abstract agreement, and functional projections in Tzotzil;Aissen, Judith;Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,1996
3. Quantified structures as barriers for LF movement;Beck, Sigrid;Natural Language Semantics,1996
4. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation;Beck, Sigrid;Natural Language Semantics,2006
5. The raising analysis of relative clauses: evidence from adjectival modification;Bhatt, Rajesh;Natural Language Semantics,2002