<em>Wh-which</em> relatives and the existence of pied-piping

Author:

Pesetsky David1ORCID,Evile Kanoe1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Abstract

This paper describes and offers an analysis of a kind of relative clause acceptable to some English speakers that we call a wh-which relative, e.g. the snowmen whom (of) which the children loved. We propose that these relatives involve the movement of a phrase headed by an element that we call R, analogous to the Q posited by Cable (2010a, 2010b) for interrogatives — the optional of in the example above being an overt form of a special variant of R. The syntax of this variant resembles particularly closely the variant of Q proposed by Coon (2009) for Ch’ol interrogatives in triggering movement to its specifier — but with a puzzle that has a parallel in Finnish, for which we propose a tentative solution. The analysis thus supports the overall explanatory landscape for pied-piping phenomena proposed by Cable, but presents a challenge to his broader claim that all pied-piping phenomena can be explained in this way. If correct, it provides yet one more instance of the "unity in diversity" of syntactic structures across the world’s languages.

Publisher

Open Library of the Humanities

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference43 articles.

1. Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/AAI3104085/.

2. Pied-piping, abstract agreement, and functional projections in Tzotzil;Aissen, Judith;Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,1996

3. Quantified structures as barriers for LF movement;Beck, Sigrid;Natural Language Semantics,1996

4. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation;Beck, Sigrid;Natural Language Semantics,2006

5. The raising analysis of relative clauses: evidence from adjectival modification;Bhatt, Rajesh;Natural Language Semantics,2002

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3