Abstract
Headphone checks have rapidly become an assumed part of best practices in online perception studies. Do they actually improve our ability to find phonological patterns? They are an indirect way of trying to ensure clear audio for all participants; it is not clear that controlling for this aspect of the participants' listening setup will necessarily decrease overall variation or produce better results. This study attempts to replicate three perceptual effects that depend on different aspects of the acoustic signal, testing whether excluding participants based on two headphone checks (Huggins pitch perception, Milne et al 2021; dichotic loudness perception, Woods et al 2017) makes the results clearer. The Huggins check improves results for how spectral tilt influences duration perception, but no other results were improved by either headphone check.
Publisher
Open Library of the Humanities
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference93 articles.
1. MTurk research: Review and recommendations;Aguinis, H.Villamor, I.Ramani, R. S.;Journal of Management,2021
2. Melody recognition using three types of dichotic-pitch stimulus;Akeroyd, M. A.Moore, B. C.Moore, G. A.;Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,2001
3. The performance of active noise-canceling headphones in different noise environments;Ang, L. Y. L.Koh, Y. K.Lee, H. P.;Applied Acoustics,2017
4. Class matters: The sociolinguistics of GOOSE and GOAT in Manchester English;Baranowski, M.;Language Variation and Change,2017
5. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4;Bates, D.Mächler, M.Bolker, B.Walker, S.;Journal of Statistical Software,2015
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献