Differences between Portfolio and Traditional Test to Prospective Teachers’ Academic Achievement: A Case of Ruaha Catholic University, Tanzania

Author:

Nyinge Baraka1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Dodoma, Tanzania

Abstract

The use of portfolios towards prospective teachers’ competence acquisition as compared to tests has been of concern to most scholars worldwide. This study therefore sought to determine differences between test and portfolios in academic achievement among Ruaha Catholic University prospective teachers. It involved the use of descriptive survey research design and was guided by one null hypothesis and one alternative hypothesis. The population of the study was four 450 Ruaha Catholic University second year prospective teachers who were studying research methods in education course for the academic year 2020/2021. The sample of the study was 50 participants who were selected by using simple random sampling. Data was collected by using two instruments namely test and portfolio which were administered and then later scores were used for comparison. Findings indicated that there is a statistically significant difference between test and portfolio in academic achievement among the prospective teachers. The study recommends that higher education institutions should put effort on the use of portfolios as one of authentic assessment tools rather that dominantly using traditional paper and pen tests.

Publisher

Gitoya Centre for Academic Research and Dissemination

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation

Reference49 articles.

1. Anderson, L. W. (2003). Classroom assessment: Enhancing the quality of teacher decision making. Routledge Taylor and Francis.

2. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

3. Barnett, R. (2007). Assessment in higher education: An impossible mission? In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 31– 40). Routledge.

4. Best, J. ., & Kahn, J. . (1998). Research in education (8th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.

5. Binh, N. (2021). Portfolio assessment as a tool for promoting reflection in teacher education: A literature review. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 37(4).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3