Indigenous Conflict Resolution and the Protection of Human Rights among the Talensi of Ghana

Author:

Naya Zuure David1,Hikah Benson George2,S. Achanson Adams3

Affiliation:

1. Centre for African Studies, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana

2. Department of Social Studies Education, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana

3. Faculty of Education, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana

Abstract

Indigenous approaches to conflicts resolution in African societies provide appropriate fora and opportunities for members of the societies to process their disputes when they do arise. The indigenous approaches are structured and rooted on cultures and traditions of the societies in which they are applied. The Talensi traditional area has its indigenous approach based on its culture and tradition as well. However, there are concerns with regards to how indigenous approaches to conflict resolution recognize and respect the human rights of persons involved in the process. This paper examined how the Talensi indigenous conflict resolution approach recognizes and respects the human rights of the disputants. It was a qualitative research which employed the case study design. Two chiefs, three elders to chiefs’ councils and five disputants were purposively and conveniently selected as sample for the study. The instruments in terms of interview, focused group discussion and observation were used to gather data for the study. It emerged from the study that the various considered human rights (rights to life, non-discrimination, freedom of religion and belief and prohibition of torture and other ill-treatment) of disputants were recognized and respected to a large extent under the Talensi indigenous approach to conflict resolution. It was, therefore, recommended that the approach is replicated in other rural societies in Ghana so as to ensure the recognition and respect for disputants rights as many people in rural Ghana practically rely on indigenous approaches to process their disputes.

Publisher

Gitoya Centre for Academic Research and Dissemination

Reference46 articles.

1. Annan, N. (2013): Providing peace, security and justice in Ghana: The role of non-state actors. Policy Brief. Accra: KAIPTC.

2. Awedoba. A. K. (2014). The peoples of northern Ghana. Accra: National Commission on Culture.

3. Azar, E. (1994). Protracted international conflicts: Ten prepositions in Rabie, M. Conflict Resolution and Ethnicity. London: Praeger.

4. Bimpong-Buta, S.Y. (2013). Essential requirements of customary arbitration. Daily Graphic, 14 November, 2013, p. 10.

5. Boege, V. (2006). Traditional approaches to conflict transformation—Potentials and Limits. Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3